Subscribe to this blog

  • RSS
  • RSS
    Google Reader or Homepage
    del.icio.us Items
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Subscribe with Bloglines
    Subscribe in NewsGator Online

    myFeedster
    Add to My AOL

Tags

Building Transit in "Final Frontier"
Wednesday, March 18, 2009 3:10 PM  

 

 

Frank J. Wilson in front of busFrank J. Wilson, METRO's president & CEO, has worked on both coasts - but it's the Gulf Coast he calls the final frontier for transit - the land that transit forgot.

In the nation's fourth largest city with three downtowns and where more than 2,000 people are moving every year, building transit is a challenge - but one METRO is ready to tackle.

"Can we build fast enough to influence where they go, or are we going to have to catch up to the location decisions they make? One's easy to serve. The other is really difficult to serve," Wilson told Mass Transit, a monthly industry publication.

In a wide-ranging cover story of the March issue, Wilson discussed with Mass Transit the success of our one rail line, what we're doing to prevent rail accidents, our fleet replacement plan, hybrid buses, Signature bus and an innovative way to buy trains.

On Main Street rail line's success:

"Before there was a rail line on Main Street, Houston didn't understand what rail was. And the first year after it was here, it was a curse that was sent here by the transit gods," said Wilson.

"And now it's irreplaceable in five short years. There's no here who's going to say we should roll it up and give Main Street back to the automobile," he continued.

It succeeded because of the locations the 7.5 mile line connects - the financial district, downtown and the Texas Medical Center.

"There is no other place that connects all that...Now people use this as a horizontal elevator. It's like a cable car but flat - on and off, on and off, on and off," said Wilson.

On off-the-rack procurement:

Traditionally, transit agencies give train manufacturers a long list of specifications. But when METRO set out to buy its new light-rail vehicles, it told the METRO's new train coming in 2012prospective vendors there was a short list: no specs.

Wilson asked the vendors to select the car they felt the most comfortable with and pitch that. There had to be at least 10 vehicles running and METRO would send its staff to evaluate them.

"It was their car on their terms at their price. I'm just selecting the one that looked best price-wise," said Wilson. "We're not dictating the terms. We're accepting the terms from the marketplace...Just give me your best offer on your best car. I'll either accept it or reject it," said Wilson.

It was an unconventional way to buy trains - but one that shaved time and money from the standard process. On the left is a photo of the CAF USA train we expect to have in 2012.

Click here to read the complete article.

Comments

wi11ie said:

There's no here who's going to say we should roll it up and give Main Street back to the automobile

HUH?

wi11ie

# March 18, 2009 5:20 PM

Royko said:

wi11ie,

Sure, I will.

Shut the Lee. P. Brown legacy boondoggle down now, and cut our losses!

# March 18, 2009 6:29 PM

DominicMazoch said:

Well, N. Main just north of what was known as the Main Street Subway (CF "Conerstone" in concrete wall) looks like a place NASA could train future astronauts on how to live on the moon.  It has that many craters! Pavement is more endangered than a whooping crane!  Buses which run there must have no air rides!

# March 18, 2009 8:33 PM

wi11ie said:

Ah yes, in past posts i have referred to that Section of North Main as the surface of the moon.

Hizzoner the Mayor has obviously never taken a trip up that one there.. cause if he did it would be repaired..Perhaps we can get his driver to trip him through there and discover the "fun" that assaults operators of the 1,9,15,24, etc.

wi11ie

# March 18, 2009 11:12 PM

Todd said:

Willie I have a full size truck, and even i take a beating driving on that end of Main Street by UH-Downtown and the hernandez tunnel.

# March 18, 2009 11:38 PM

wi11ie said:

I am sure that when its time comes that section of Main will be repaired(meaning all the people will be moved out and then the pavement will be replaced) and Hizzoner will declare it an urban miracle..

wi11ie

# March 19, 2009 8:49 AM

DominicMazoch said:

Humans are so illogical.  SPACE is the final frontier!

# March 19, 2009 9:14 PM

DominicMazoch said:

actually, N Main needs pavement as far north as the Heights Transit center, or even the Loop.

# March 19, 2009 9:16 PM

Robert said:

Mary:

Where is Quickline?

# March 19, 2009 10:42 PM

C said:

"Final Frontier"... Interesting

# March 20, 2009 1:50 AM

mizz_porkie said:

yes Robert I'd like to know that answer!!  I do know those buses were repainted white as is the rest of the fleet!

Has the quickline plan  been scrapped?

# March 20, 2009 4:21 AM

Steve Palmer said:

I too am curious about Quickline. We have heard nothing about it for quite a while.

# March 20, 2009 9:28 AM

J. Liggins said:

I too would like to know what happened with the Quickline service.

# March 20, 2009 9:40 AM

wi11ie said:

A colossal waste of time and money apparently.

Look for the Airport $15 to go the same way I fear..

It HAS to be losing cash on a biblical scale.. The operators on that route make more than $15 per trip I would guess.

wi11ie

# March 20, 2009 11:59 AM

JamesL said:

I suspect the Bellaire Quickline is waiting on all the construction near Stella Link, though I'm not sure why that would be a huge impediment. If anything, they should want to launch it now and possibly reduce traffic (however slightly) through the constricted area.

In any event, a straight answer would be nice. We're coming up on the seven month anniversary of the official start date.

# March 20, 2009 2:26 PM

Robert said:

JamesL: I wasn't aware of the construction in the area; but that raises a good point.

Since this is a proof-of-concept, Metro may want to ensure that the first week/month/quarter of service yields the most positive statistics and rider goodwill so that it experiences less push-back when it moves toward extending Quickline to other corridors. The burdensome street traffic in the area could skew the statistics away from what Metro would expect though the service's life cycle.

Everyone on this board is pro-transit (even Royko, who's just against at-grade light rail), so we would all be inclined to support measures that would help along limited-stop bus service like Quickline in the long run. Given that, why won't you tell us the story, Mary?

# March 20, 2009 9:05 PM

DominicMazoch said:

Maybe METRO learned something from SA VIA where you can run Skip Stop Service (Something like what our QL would be) using Regular buses.  

Now there are more Orions coming.  Maybe they will the QL's.

The plot thinkens.  Where is Agatha Christi when you need her.

# March 20, 2009 10:39 PM

Don G said:

First, I would like to add to the discussion of the change to the topic of Quickline.

Metro posted on their website the following;

"July 31, 2008

Quickline Signature Bus Service rolls out on Bellaire next month

METRO will soon be rolling out its Quickline Signature Bus Service, offering upgraded buses, fewer stops and more modern, comfortable bus stops. Quickline Signature Bus Service will run on three routes, totaling 18 miles."

That was close to 7 months ago and the link to the above does not seem to exist in Metro's News Releases.

A month or so ago, I saw three of these Quickline buses, all brand new with the Q Line logo on the side of silver grey and white vehicles over close to the West maintenance yard close to where I live.

About three months ago, I called City Hall and complained abount one such stop at Kirby and Holcombe.  

It seems they decided to rush the installation (as they did with the Main St trolley) and no one checked the compliance with codes.  A large signage panel waqs installed perpendicular to the roadway and close to the curb.  It made for a blind spot for people exiting the strip center there (mainly those in standard sedans and minis.

Metro removed the sign but now all there is is an exposed electric meter and electric boxes on steel struts.

I advised the councilmember that there were other locations with the same danger.

People still come and sit at the stop thinking that a Metro bus will come, when the actual working stop is across the redlight.

The excuse of road work is mute, IMHO, as it is always happening.  I drive on the section in question and it will slow down ALL buses so the one's with less stops would come out ahead anywaqy.

Mary tends to not answere all questions asked of her so the blog is not working like most do.

(Still waiting for Metro to provide a blog where one can change text, add links and pics and provide a means to know who the posters are versus imposters.

# March 21, 2009 3:35 PM

C said:

Scrap the "quickline" and improve the current service.

# March 21, 2009 3:43 PM

Don G said:

Now on Metro's Wilson article and his views.

First, he makes the bold statement;

“And now it’s irreplaceable in five short years. There’s no one here who’s going to say we should roll it up and give Main Street back to the automobile."

I, and many others I have talked to, both before and after construction, say it IS relaceable and should be "rolled up".

My wife's boss owns several properties on Main downtown and they sit empty and few businesses exist that are making money.

I am curious, as a side note, as to exactly how well the newest Houston Pavilions is really doing?  We have been involved with House Of Blues and they have had to cancel several shows, etc.

Main Street was far more active prior to the rail line and now most action is on Louisiana and Fannin.

Anyone wishing to buy a building on Main downtown can drop me a line as our friend would be interested.

Frank compares Houston to Chicago and NYC as a lst frontier while those two cities both have grade separated real mass transit lines, not at grade trolley car lines that average 14.8 MPH and cause conflicts for all other modes that worsen total movement.

# March 21, 2009 3:53 PM

C said:

DonG

I am working on a website now.

# March 21, 2009 7:33 PM

DominicMazoch said:

Wi11ie,

"Assaults the ops" on mentioned N Main Local routes?  What about the poor patrons in "Those Seats" in the 35 and 3600's.  Say, we could get free buses, and have the makers try them out there as part of product testing!

# March 22, 2009 12:52 PM

DominicMazoch said:

One thing about Main Street that is true now and was true before rail was you could not make a left tun off of it.  

And to me, Main was dying before the LRT was put in.  In the Downtown Area, three buildings are blanned/built:  Rusk and Main, The Pavillions, and one near Main and Texas.

Mid-town not much seems to be moving.  However, there seems to be something going in in the vacant lot near McGowen Station.  Some sort of loft type thing. (Cedric, need help here!)

Part of the problem with midtown seems to be in the deed resctictions.  You can only do so much with the land, and you have to provide so much space for this and that.

Then again, no one will build if there is no money to lend.  And no money, people cannot spend at the Blues, or elsewhere.

Speaking about that facility the Blues is in, they made one HUGE mistake.  the connections between the stores is OPEN AIR.  In HOUSTON.  Need I say more!

I walked along Fannin/San Jac once.  Because of the routes which go there, forgetaboutit!  Lack of money does not give anybody the right to be uncivilized!

# March 22, 2009 1:07 PM

DominicMazoch said:

Final Frontier?  Ever heard of the St. Charles Street car line?  Like New Orleans!  Last I heard, it is still on the Gulf Coast, in spite of Katrinia!

# March 22, 2009 7:13 PM

DominicMazoch said:

And we don't have three downtowns.  We have three very large activity centers, one which is Downtown.  the other two are the Med Center and Grewway/Uptown!

Next thing you know, everything inside 610 will be Downtown.  Would I consider Englewood Yards and the Basin DT?  Hades NO!

And a fourth large activity center is growig:  Memorial City area at IH-10 and Gessner!

# March 22, 2009 7:24 PM

Mary Sit said:

METRO is finalizing details on the Signature Bus service and hopes to launch it in the near future.

# March 23, 2009 5:44 PM

JamesL said:

Thanks, Mary, but no thanks. That's been the story for the better part of a year now.

# March 23, 2009 6:27 PM

Mary Sit said:

The Signature Bus service has been delayed for myriad reasons, including construction on Bellaire and redesigning and enhancing the bus stops to make them feel/look like train stations.

We want this to be a great experience for our riders - hence, the delays to fine-tune the details. We don't have a firm date of when we'll be rolling out this service - but it will be soon.

# March 24, 2009 11:37 AM

J. Liggins said:

Mary, it is a bus, not a train, thus, we do not need dressed up bus stops.  A simple Galleria style bus stop would have been sufficient if it would have sped up the process.  All this window dressing will mean nil if the service is terrible and no one rides, then it will be a waste like the Airport Direct.  

# March 24, 2009 12:51 PM

JamesL said:

Don't shoot the messenger, J. Decisions regarding Quickline obviously aren't hers to make.

# March 24, 2009 5:25 PM

Max Wilson said:

The train is a sad, expensive toy. An elevated railway would have made more sense and would not have ruined the surface street traffic or destroyed business along the train route. How many more streets will Metro ruin in their misguided attempts to improve transit?

# March 24, 2009 10:03 PM

wi11ie said:

7?

Main was a sewer before the rail went in. The rail made some improvements to Main St. I honestly think it should have been elevated the whole trip.

BUT, there is no big money selling an 8 foot circle to hold the elevated sections. And looking at the previous owners of these properties, we now know why it is at grade.

wi11ie

# March 24, 2009 10:27 PM

J. Liggins said:

My comments aren't aimed towards Mary, and I apologize if it seems that way, it's just the fact that she's basically our only point of contact since most Metro execs refuse to post on a regular basis.  Though they aren't posting, you can still smell their influence on what Mary is allowed to post.  

# March 25, 2009 9:09 AM

Royko said:

J. Liggins,

She is being paid to fade the heat, and maintain the Orwellian facade.

# March 25, 2009 5:16 PM

Royko said:

Just pried the February numbers out of the legal dept.

Well, in Wilson's Final Frontier, he failed to state:

METRO fixed-route bus boardings again experienced a huge decline of -21.98% for February 2009 over February 2008.  Bus boardings for first five months of FY 2009 were -21.95% below the same FY 2008 period.  In real numbers, there were 8,342,100 fewer bus boardings so far during this fiscal year.  The fixed-route bus boardings for the Jan-Feb 2009 period are -24.66% less than the Jan-Feb 2004 period when the tram service was initiated.

The fixed-route bus boardings have DECLINED each of the past SIX months as compared to the same 6-month period in 2008.  There have been boarding declines in Eight of the past 11 months!

The tram boardings were again off -4.87% for February 2009, and the estimated tram boardings for the first five months of FY2009 have declined -5.21%.  The tram boardings have DECLINED each of the past SEVEN months as compared to the same 7-month period in 2008.

If this is success, the bar is dragging on the ground.

Beam us up Scotty, Hurry!

# March 25, 2009 10:24 PM

coug6666 said:

Royko, metro predicted that the new fare structure would result in a decline of 15-20% in ridership numbers! they also predicted that the would lose 10-12% in fare revenue. How much fare revenue has metro lost? I would predict that the number might suprise everyone. I would guestimate that fare revenue is close to par from previous quarters. The decline in ridership numbers are most likely due to the lost of timed passes that were done away with. Metro (whether you agree with their premise is something esle) believed that timed fare(day,weekly, and yearly passes) were not structured fairly in todays economy.They amounted to huge subsidies to a small number of riders who in metro's mind were not paying their fair share. I would like to know what are the revenue numbers?

# March 27, 2009 1:22 AM

Royko said:

coug6666,

I have the METRO sales tax revenue data back to 1987, fare box and fixed-route bus boarding data from 1/1/01, and tam revenue and boarding data back to 01/01/04 compiled from TPIA responses via the legal dept. in an EXCEL spreadsheet.

Feel free to send an email request to:

tom@bazan.net and I'll send it to you...updated monthly with commentary if you wish.

# March 27, 2009 10:06 PM
New Comments to this post are disabled