Subscribe to this blog

  • RSS
  • RSS
    Google Reader or Homepage
    del.icio.us Items
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Subscribe with Bloglines
    Subscribe in NewsGator Online

    myFeedster
    Add to My AOL

Tags

More People Turning to Passenger Trains
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 5:06 PM  

 

Amtrak trainBoth commuters and travelers between cities of up to 500 miles apart are turning to passenger trains as their option of choice in some parts of the country.

Despite the recent dip in fuel prices, the generally high cost of fuel, plus airport congestion, is drawing people back to trains. Amtrak reported a record 28.7 million riders in the year ending Sept. 30. That is 11 percent more than the year before - and the sixth consecutive year of increased ridership.

Amtrak's ticket sales soared to a record $1.7 billion, a $200 million increase from the year before.

Californians are going to the polls today and vote on whether to launch the nation's most ambitious rail project, authorizing almost $10 billion in bonds for planning and construction of an 800-mile network of bullet trains that would connect San Francisco and San Diego, with cities in between.

Midwest transit officials are promoting a plan to link cities in nine states in a hub-and-spoke system located in Chicago. It's called the Midwest Regional Rail Initiative.

Closer to home, the Trans-Texas Corridor would connect the triangle of Houston-San Antonio-Dallas. This transportation network would be a multi-use, statewide system that would include new and existing highways, railways, utility rights-of-way - and high-speed commuter railways. Bullet train in Japan - California voters deciding on similar whether to build similar train

Right now, two projects are being developed: I-69/TTC, extending from Texarkana/Shreveport to Mexico (possibly the Rio Grande Valley or Laredo) and TTC-35, which runs parallel to I-35 from north of Dallas/Forth Worth to Mexico and possibly the Gulf Coast, according to the Texas Department of Transportation.

Forecasters predict people who live, work and drive in Texas will increase more than 64 percent over the next 25 years. Most will move to urban areas where we simply cannot continue expanding existing highway system to meet the increased transit needs, say officials. The network would be funded by private investors.

Congress last month passed a law whose goal is to provide $13 billion over five years to Amtrak. The measure also promotes high-speed rail corridors, with $2 billion of grants for states to improve or start service between cities. The money, however, has not yet been appropriated. And with our economy in crisis, rail supporters say they're not certain they'll be able to get this funding.

 

 

Comments

J. Liggins said:

Yes, that trend extends into Houston as well. And particularly when certain transit agencies force riders onto said passenger trains when the commute was easier and more reliable by bus.

I'm just saying.

# November 4, 2008 8:05 PM

DominicMazoch said:

Question:  How many main tracks would it take to move the same abount of people on the Airbus 380 Runway Wide Katy Freeway?

Or the better question:  How long befor the above gets supper congested again?

# November 4, 2008 9:22 PM

Royko said:

Few realize the risks of derailment are huge for these systems.  Let alone the exposure to anti-American terrorists, especially when we continue to suffer from a pourous border.  Since most readers are public school graduates, they likely have no clue as to how dangerous train travel was 100 years ago.

# November 5, 2008 7:11 AM

James said:

Rokyo:

a) Your arrogance is astounding. How dare you draw that conclusion and hold it against someone.

b) 100 years ago is relevant...how?

c) Thousands of high-speed and millions of other trains operate every day with remarkable safety records.

# November 5, 2008 2:24 PM

don said:

Ay one time trains were the safest form of traveling. I'm not sure about today but I'm sure that they are  safer than automobiles. As far as anti-American terrorists I believe that cruise ships are the most vulnerable. What right wing publication do you get your information from Mr. Royko?

# November 5, 2008 7:26 PM

Cedric Collins said:

Royko,

     Do you have the proper evidence to back up what you just said?  Perhaps the reason why you think train travel was dangerous 100 years ago (if that's even relevant) is because there wasn't much safety measures put in place to make train travel safe and comfortable for those who use it---or at least none that I know of.

# November 6, 2008 8:38 AM

Royko said:

Gee,

Where is the market demand?  I am unaware of investors clamoring to invest in high-speed rail.

# November 7, 2008 1:29 AM

Cedric Collins said:

Royko,

     Gee   you may want to read up on any benefits of high-speed rail.  If if can work wonders in countries like Japan and France, it could work here in the US---in other parts, of course and not just what you already know---I hope.  

# November 7, 2008 9:13 AM

James said:

Rokyo, did you see a line out the door at TX DOT to invest in that I-10 expansion? How about to replace the air traffic control system?

The simple fact of the matter is that moving people is not profitable. Everyone knows the streets and highways are paid for publicly, but some try to point out airlines as money-making transportation. On the contrary, and as we've seen lately, their airports, runways, security, and control systems are subsidized yet the carriers are still on the brink.

Since the government is charged with providing transportation infrastructure, it should be focused on making that infrastructure as efficient as possible. Light rail is more efficient than buses which are more efficient than cars. Trains are more efficient than cars, buses, and airplanes.

# November 7, 2008 10:02 PM

Royko said:

James,

How many Houstonians will avoid the Katy Freeway?

The tram barely generates 25-cents per boarding.  Compare that to the tollway.

People pay the gasoline tax for the HIGHWAY Trust fund, and likely would have enough to keep up with demand if it were not for the continuous "looting" by Congress for various boondoggle urban rail construction projects.

Then the local taxpayers are forced to pay for the operational subsidies and maintenance of the rail systems, which further drains resources for rubber-tired mobility.

# November 10, 2008 8:19 PM

Cedric Collins said:

Royko said:  "How many Houstonians will avoid the Katy Freeway?"

Ummm---no offense but---ummm---do you honestly think anybody is going to answer that?  Why don't you just ask if anybody would avoid just about all the freeways in Houston.

# November 11, 2008 2:36 PM

Royko said:

Mr. CoLLins,

The obvious point is that Houstonians depend on rubber-tired transportation.  The boondoggle tram is wasting our precious tranportation resources.

# November 11, 2008 5:11 PM

Cedric Collins said:

(knocks on head)  Hello?  Is anybody home?!

Still think that most people will agree with you, huh Royko?  (buzzer) WRONG!  "Our?"  Who's our?  How can the LRT be wasteful.  If it was, then why is it STILL HERE?!

I ride that LRT almost daily and it suits me just fine, thank you.  As long as it shows up, I'm happy.

Wait---the train isn't going to show up?  Meh---I can STILL get to where I need to be by bus.

BTW, that's not a valid point because REAL Houstonians---like me---depend on BOTH!

# November 12, 2008 7:20 AM

C said:

I find the "public school" remark funny. I graduated from a private school and I couldnt tell you a thing about train safety.

but I do think the METROrail is a waste... there are way too many stops and its slow

a line like the one metro uses should stop at Fannin, TMC, and Main Street Square... Screw all those other stops. Its going to be interesting when the new lines are built.

# November 12, 2008 11:20 AM

ChloeMireille said:

All I ask from Amtrak is a train route to Dallas. Not because I want to go to Dallas, but because there's no northbound service from Houston. Your choices are San Antonio or New Orleans, and THEN go north.

# November 13, 2008 9:04 AM

James said:

If you call the Sunset Limited "service". In the short term, Texas should have multiple departures daily among the large cities. Then the Texas Triangle high speed rail should be revisited. I'm convinced it would work well here.

# November 13, 2008 8:57 PM

J. Liggins said:

A nice chat I just had with an utterly useless "customer service rep."

Rep - Typical Metro introduction.

Me - Good morning, I'm traveling from Briarpark and Richmond.  The bus I normally take on Sundays, the eastbound 2 - Bellaire from Westchase schedualed to depart at 9:07am is normally late by varying amounts from 10 to 25 minutes.  Before I go out and wait in the cold for a bus that might show up extremely late and cause me to miss my connection, I'd like to know if this particular bus is already behind schedule so that if it is, I may make other travel arrangements such as catching the 82 - Westheimer.

Rep - Well, we can't call on a bus to see if it's late.

Me - Oh, okay. So, you have the technology to do this, but basically you want me to go outside and wait in the cold to see if it's late and then call back and report that you you all so you can confirm it?

Rep - Yes, and we'll confirm it with dispatch.

Me- Hmmm, makes sense, inconvenience the customer.  Thank you.

*Click*

Metro, you all are brainless, spineless idiots.

# November 16, 2008 8:57 AM

Cedric Collins said:

Folks,

     If mass transit just isn't doing it for ya (for whatever BS reason you come up with---even if they look like legitimate ones), THEN WHY ARE YOU STILL USING IT?!  I would like to tell ya to take the taxi but they're no better than mass transit anyways so.....

# November 17, 2008 12:15 PM
New Comments to this post are disabled