Subscribe to this blog

  • RSS
  • RSS
    Google Reader or Homepage
    del.icio.us Items
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Subscribe with Bloglines
    Subscribe in NewsGator Online

    myFeedster
    Add to My AOL

Tags

Transit Agencies Nationwide Increasing Fares
Friday, October 17, 2008 4:39 PM    

Dollar billsFare increases like METRO's announced 25 percent increase are happening at transit agencies all over the nation.

The economic pressures are the same: Costs to operate transit systems have outpaced the rate of fare increases. Expenses, such as fuel, electricity and health insurance, have climbed at agencies everywhere.

For example, at Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority, (WMTA) its Web site reports fuel costs have risen 360 percent; electricity, 30 percent and health insurance at least 86 percent - all since 1995.

Here at METRO, our fuel costs will double next year (FY 09). Our fare box revenues for FY 09 are projected to be about $68 million. That would cover   about 20 percent of our operating expenses. The rest is covered mostly by our 1 percent sales tax and a small portion by federal grants.

In the 14 years since we last raised fares, inflation has increased 48 percent, while our service has grown 18 percent.

Let's take a look at what some other major agencies are doing, based on an analysis by WMTA.

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority

 

  • Cash fares up 20 percent in 2009.
  • Day pass up 66 percent in 2007, and 100 percent by 2009.
  • Monthly pass up 19 percent in 2007, 44 percent by 2009.

Chicago Transit Authority

 

  • Base fares up 14 percent for both rail and bus in 2006.
  • Planning to raise fares again from 14 to 50 percent while cutting 39 bus routes.

Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

 

  • From 2000 to 2007, base bus fares up 66 to 100 percent and base subway fares up 70 to 100 percent.

Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

 

  • Across-the-board fare increase of 11 percent this year.
  • Tokens and transfers up by 15 cents.

New York City Transit

 

  • Facing $1.7 billion budget deficit, prompting discussion on increased subsidies and fares.

Read more here.

So while we understand that a fare increase coming on the heels of a devastating and costly hurricane is creating hardship for some of our riders, please know that this transit agency is not alone in raising fares. Q Card

We are still one of the best bargains around. Even with our fare increase, METRO still has one of the lowest fares in the nation. Base fares for Dallas and Ft. Worth are $1.50; Los Angeles, $1.25; Baltimore, $1.60, and in Atlanta, St. Louis and Denver, $1.75.

"We have kept our annual operating costs essentially flat over the last five years," said METRO President & CEO Frank J. Wilson, in a statement. "There is no other successful business I know of that is expanding service and facing extreme cost increases, yet spends no more money doing so."

One more thing to keep in mind: No transit agency makes money off its fares - or even breaks even. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted by Mary Sit
Filed under:

Comments

august948 said:

Do the increased fuel costs cited take into account any of the recent precipitous drop in oil prices?  If a large part of the oil price run-up of the last year was speculation and that's now being wrung out of the market, isn't metro overstating it's expense case?

# October 17, 2008 5:56 PM

J. Liggins said:

The difference between those agencies and Metro is that they provide a variety of reliable transit options while Houston provides a system of broken, unreliable buses and one puny rail line that was birthed from parts of multiple bus lines.

Metro bus service is not even worth the dollar you charge now, let alone $1.25.  

That's the problem.

# October 17, 2008 8:04 PM

Clue said:

"See?  It's okay, 'cause everybody else is doing it too!" doesn't work as a mature, responsible explanation.  Rather, it reeks of grasping for excuses.

# October 18, 2008 8:33 AM

Robert said:

Absolutely agreed, Clue. Metro still has not taken the time to respond to charges that they are raising fares to pay for executive compensation. Metro still has not taken the time to demonstrate that increased fares will result in increased service. Metro still has not taken the time to demonstrate that costs have risen to such a level that a 25% increase is necessary beyond allusions to the increasing price of goods in general.

Metro: People are not going to be distracted into supporting your fare increases with your aquatic squad, swat team, George Foreman photo-ops, or the apparently never-gonna-happen "Quickline" service. You need to address this issue here, not in some meeting two days after a hurricane.

# October 18, 2008 8:06 PM

Don G said:

There is much more to the woes of transit authorities nationwide.  

Many of them decided to make their books look good so they sold some of their assets and leased them back.

Metro did this and Mary should be able to tell us exactly how many buses, etc are sold-leased back?

Anyway,  I received this news today that looks to show a bubble in the process of bursting (all with tacpayer money mine you!).

The following story; "MTA may have to cut commuter service",  sub-title:  "It may not be able to keep trains and buses running if it has to quickly pay investors in AIG-related lease-back deals."

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-transit18-2008oct18,0,3698748.story

The latest financial statement on Metro's website, papes 62-64 show that Metro has 12 lease agreements currently woth a balance of roughly $278 Million.

On page 62 it states that AIG is the guarantor for the facilities and FSA Inc holds the buses and fare boxes, radios.

FSA is also having serious problems and is one of the hinge pins of the current decay in the financial word.

Metro, by selling and leasing back, showed a book increase of from $6.7 to $3.3 Million in the years 2001-2003, interestingly, the exact years when Metro was trying to get funding for the Main St line.

# October 18, 2008 9:07 PM

Mike Harrington said:

This isn't an outrageous fare increase.  Transit systems across the USA have been cutting costs for so long that there is simply nothing left to cut.  I'd rather pay another quarter than lose service entirely.  

Even if the local fare were $2, it would still be a bargain.  People grossly underestimate the cost of driving.

# October 20, 2008 3:11 PM

Cedric Collins said:

Mike Harrington said:  "I'd rather pay another quarter than lose service entirely.  Even if the local fare were $2, it would still be a bargain.  People grossly underestimate the cost of driving."

FINALLY!  A comment that makes sense.  I agree with what Mr. Harrington said 100%!  In other words, I 2nd that!  For those riders who still think this is unfair because of whatever excuses they put out there, CAN'T HELP YA!

# October 21, 2008 9:28 AM

C said:

Well

Since METRO is in the "monkey see, monkey do" mode... Let’s get some prime service like New York or LA...

And screen some of these crazy drivers, PLEASE!

# October 21, 2008 7:44 PM

pissed said:

I think what pisses me off the most is metro's comment "for the first time in 14 years, metro is implementing new fares."  BS.  What was the Q card?

I'll tell you.  $78 / month got you UNLIMITED rides from zone 2, zone 1, and all local busses for 30 days.

Then with the q card it went to $2.50 each way, no locals, no whenever.  However you want to slice it, that's at least a 22% fare increase in itself.

Now for zone 2 it's going up another 30%.  I'd have felt better if they just hosed me to begin with or -- perhaps -- thought it out first a little better.

But don't come tell me the first time in 14 years.  This was THIS YEAR, FOLKS.

# November 6, 2008 3:47 PM

pissed said:

And you know, if the a/c worked (i.e, adjusted) so it was not on 100% arctic blast or 100% roasting oven, and the seats that were stuck in recline worked, and IF they fixed the seals on the emergency exits so the bus did not pee on me every time it rained, I'd be less likely to complain about a fare increase.

But no.  Nothing changes.  And it's not the operators fault.  They can put tickets in all day long and nothing will change.  I feel for them, as customers complain all day and there is nothing they can really do.  They are stuck.

With this extra $$, FIX YOUR BUSSES.

# November 6, 2008 3:49 PM
New Comments to this post are disabled