Subscribe to this blog

  • RSS
  • RSS
    Google Reader or Homepage
    del.icio.us Items
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Subscribe with Bloglines
    Subscribe in NewsGator Online

    myFeedster
    Add to My AOL

Tags

METRO Helps Spring Valley Improve Streets
Tuesday, July 01, 2008 2:55 PM  

Tree in front of Spring Valley administrative buildilngThose of you who live in West Houston and drive through tony Spring Valley Village, know not to speed. I remember when I got my driver's license in high school, the warning that was passed down to new drivers: Never speed in Spring Valley.

Now drivers will begin to notice road construction and delays if they wind their way down Voss and Bracher Roads. But that's good news. Spring Valley Village will launch a $3.3 million road improvement project, thanks to METRO.

The design and construction of the Voss/Bracher project - which actually totals $3,305,000 - include the following work:

 

  • Concrete curb and gutter reconstruction of the two-lane roadway from I-10 westbound feeder road north to Lanell Street.
  • A concrete bridge that replaces a wooden one.
  • Construction of sidewalks on both sides of the street.
  • Converting an open-ditch roadway drainage to an underground drainage system.

Spring Valley officials, of course, are ecstatic.

"If it hadn't been for METRO, this city would have had bad traffic issues," said T. Michael Andrews, Spring Valley's mayor. "There's no question about it - METRO has been our guardian angel."Sign: "Road Work Ahead"

Spring Valley Village is one of six Memorial Villages and was incorporated as a city in 1955. Located 10 miles west of downtown, the city has 3,611 residents in a 1.6-mile area.

METRO is funding Spring Valley's project from its General Mobility Program, which sets aside one-quarter of the 1-cent sales tax revenues for the city, Harris County and multi-city members.

We have spent more than $1.6 billion on road projects since 1987. Last year, METRO paid $106.8 million to the city of Houston, Harris County and other cities in our service area to repave roads, install sewers, build sidewalks and add landscaping.

METRO expects to spend $1.23 billion in the General Mobility Program through FY 2014.  

Comments

Steve Palmer said:

I don't get the "Never speed in Spring Valley" comment. Is it because the roads there are bad enough to tear up your car (since the rest of this blog entry is all about road repair), or is it because Spring Valley is one of the many well-to-do villages inside Houston that make extra municipal pocket money by busting speeding Houstonians on their way into town?

# July 1, 2008 3:33 PM

Mary Sit said:

I remember being told that the police were extremely vigilant about watching out for speeding drivers. That's what comes to mind whenever I drive through that area.

# July 1, 2008 3:42 PM

DominicMazoch said:

In the muti-ciies in the Spring branch area, speed IS enforced.  But if you do the speed limit, how can you get a speeding ticket?

# July 1, 2008 8:07 PM

Peter Wang said:

METRO should not be building roads. Period. It should use all of its tax money to build and operate the transit system. This theft of the tax money is a Bob Lanier invention that should be gotten rid of.

# July 3, 2008 10:38 AM

Cedric Collins said:

Peter Wang said:  "METRO should not be building roads. Period. It should use all of its tax money to build and operate the transit system."

True---like using the money to get more two-car trains, bike racks that can hold three bikes instead of the usual two, and possibly hybrid you-know-whats=>Dominic knows but my lips are sealed.

# July 3, 2008 12:54 PM

Steve Palmer said:

DominicMazoch said:  

"In the muti-ciies in the Spring branch area, speed IS enforced.  But if you do the speed limit, how can you get a speeding ticket?"

What bugs me is that these wealthy little towns have enough cops with enough time on their hands that they can pull in extra municipal income by ticketing speeding Houstonians, whereas Houston doesn't have enough cops to return the favor. Thus, the rich towns get richer, and our (relatively) poor city stays poor.

# July 8, 2008 11:35 AM

DominicMazoch said:

Cedric:

The A-bus?

All:

I don't mind METRO improving a road, if and only if:

1.  The street will be used for a transit route.

2.  Better access to a P&R or station lot.

# July 9, 2008 8:39 PM

DominicMazoch said:

But acrually, from 1979 until now, 25% of the tax was to be for "general mobility" projects.  But I thought they were for things like street widening, paving, and traffic mangement.  But they also can be used for jury duty service...............?

# July 9, 2008 8:42 PM

ChloeMireille said:

Well, maybe if Voss is being widened, that could mean the 32-Voss/Bingle MIGHT happen one day.

Yeah, I know, wishful thinking.

# July 10, 2008 9:02 AM

Cedric Collins said:

Yes, Dominic---the A-bus.

# July 10, 2008 11:46 AM

Cedric Collins said:

ChloeMireille said:  "Well, maybe if Voss is being widened, that could mean the 32-Voss/Bingle MIGHT happen one day."

Uh-huh......yeah......but will enough people be willing to ride this route?  You don't want METRO to create a route that not too many people will ride and then METRO gets rid of it due to low ridership, correct?

# July 10, 2008 3:02 PM

DominicMazoch said:

People might ride it if it went to the Galleria.  Anything has to be faster than the 33 Post Oak Slowtown.

# July 10, 2008 8:40 PM

ChloeMireille said:

"Uh-huh......yeah......but will enough people be willing to ride this route?  You don't want METRO to create a route that not too many people will ride and then METRO gets rid of it due to low ridership, correct?"

I'd rather they try and fail than not try at all. And I'm sure you remember hearing about it, this time 4 years ago. They were going to run it from Hillcroft TC up Hillcroft/Voss/Bingle to somewhere on the Northwest side, I forget where. The route was planned by Metro and everything, and they backed out for no particular reason.

And I think the ridership is there because right now there's only 2 buses that run from Southwest Houston to Northwest Houston, the 46-Gessner and the 33-Post Oak. By starting it at Hillcroft TC, it becomes an extension of the 47-Hillcroft Crosstown, thus creating service on Hillcroft from S. Main up to 290.

# July 11, 2008 9:42 AM

DominicMazoch said:

We also need hybrid.......

.........got you, not only the A-bus

but some micros, so we can start something like the proposed 32......

Island Tranist in Galvestion uses some minis for regular route service.

# July 13, 2008 8:20 PM

C said:

wait, wait, wait...

You mean to tell me METRO is dropping $3.3 million on a street project where people rarely ride, but cant place new buses for the 102 where people actually ride?

I guess they'll have those convenient "one seat" routes to go downtown and to the Galleria, TxMC...

# July 14, 2008 12:59 AM

Cedric Collins said:

Creating a route and have it fail is a waste of time, resourses, etc.  I still would suggest talking about a new route to those folks who'll see that route go through their area(s) of town before making the route a reality.

Want some "micro" hybrids?  Tak to Orion Bus Industries.  At least they can give you such a model with TWO doors---unlike New Flyer.

# July 15, 2008 9:00 AM

DominicMazoch said:

Cedric:

But I wish OBI would make those OTHER units.  At least i did not see then at their web site!

# July 15, 2008 9:04 PM

Cedric Collins said:

Dominic,

       If you're talking about the "A" bus with that thing in the middle, OBI doesn't make those kinds of buses---yet.  They might but not right now.  Here's what they DO make:

Orion V=>Diesel, CNG.

Orion VII Next Generation=>Diesel, CNG, HEV.

They do NOT make the old style O7 bus similar to what NYCMTA has---for example.

# July 17, 2008 10:56 AM
New Comments to this post are disabled