Subscribe to this blog

  • RSS
  • RSS
    Google Reader or Homepage
    del.icio.us Items
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Subscribe with Bloglines
    Subscribe in NewsGator Online

    myFeedster
    Add to My AOL

Tags

Houston METRO Touted as Model for Transit Solutions
Tuesday, May 06, 2008 11:36 AM  

Red Line at night

The nation's top leader at the Federal Transit Administration mentioned Houston recently as a model that could offer a 21st-century solution to a transportation infrastructure that has hit a tipping point.

Jim Simpson, administrator at the FTA, said in a speech at the Transportation Operations Summit in Linthicum, Maryland, that we as a nation cannot effectively solve the nation's road congestion problems or bridge the funding gap for existing transit systems without trying innovative steps.

For example, congestion pricing, high-speed electronic tolling and public-private partnerships are three strategies to generate new funding sources, said Simpson. And that's where METRO comes in.

METRO is one of three locations that the FTA has selected for public-private partnership demonstrations. Denver and Oakland, Calif., are the other two.

"The idea is that the grantees contract with private partners to design, build, finance, operate and maintain transit facilities - from rail and bus stations to parking garages," said Simpson in his speech.

"These arrangements offer many potential advantages, by supplementing public funding with private equity and debt...transferring long-term financial risks to the private sector...and speeding up project construction and delivery, which in turn may reduce costs on some transit projects," he continued.

Click here to read Simpson's entire speech.

The Highway Trust Fund - the traditional source of funding for infrastructure - is expected to show a deficit of $3 billion by next year. The Department of Transportation estimates we need about $22 billion a year to improve the condition and performance of existing transit systems through 2024. METRORail with flowers in foreground

Clearly, we need sources of new revenues - and the FTA is hoping its New Starts program, of which METRO is a part, will jump-start public-private partnerships on capital transit projects.  Click here to read more on the Public-Private Partnership Pilot Program (Penta-P).

Last week at METRO, we announced our new private partner - Parsons Transportation Group - which will serve as our lead facility provider and is expected to complete $12 million of work on three light-rail lines by year's end.

We are hoping our new partner will help us meet our goal - and that of the New Starts pilot - of streamlining the work and spreading the risks of new construction.

The good news, said Simpson, is that the FTA's fiscal 2008 budget includes an all-time record of $9.5 billion for public transportation. That includes increases for almost every project the FTA funds.

That's great news for motorists who are grappling with gas nearing $4-a-gallon.  Public transit - including METRO's five light-rail lines by 2012 - is looking more attractive every day.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

Cedric Collins said:

Big mistake by talking about anything that has to do with METRORail because Mr. Roykeaux will most likely pounce at this.

Good luck, METRO, on doing what you need to do for transit in Houston.

# May 6, 2008 1:11 PM

J. Liggins said:

Yeesh, if Metro is the model for solutions, I'd hate to see what's going on at TAs that need to follow Metro's lead.

Ever since Metro announced that they'd be doing all light rail, things have seemingly gone south.  The delays, the issues, the contractor change and when you add that to the terrible bus service as of late with no improvements in sight you kind of have to wonder the state of public transit in general if Metro is thought of highly.

# May 6, 2008 2:09 PM

Royko said:

Ms. Sit,

Was Parsons involved in the "Big Dig" boondoggle, where it has been leaking from day one, and, seemingly had something to do with the improperly bolted concrete ceiling panel falling on cars, killing a taxpayer in the main tunnel?

I need to research where there were stories over the past several years about Parsons being involved in problems associated with other transit projects around

the nation.

Why would anyone think Parsons would be any better than Siemens?  We are stuck with the shoddilly-built 7.5-mile tram, and now, if one listens to METREAUX, taxpayers are clamoring for more of the same.

# May 6, 2008 7:13 PM

Royko said:

Mr. Collins,

"Roykeaux"

I think you have captured it's essence.

As Emeril would say "BAM!"

# May 6, 2008 7:22 PM

Cedric Collins said:

Yeah---OK---Mr. Roykeaux--and now onto my better life at riding buses and trains.

"We are stuck with the shoddilly-built 7.5-mile tram"

Train, son---train.  That's what I call it and if it was too poorly built, then how come many people are faithfully riding it?

# May 6, 2008 8:04 PM

Cedric Collins said:

Royeaux said:  "Was Parsons involved in the "Big Dig" boondoggle, where it has been leaking from day one, and, seemingly had something to do with the improperly bolted concrete ceiling panel falling on cars, killing a taxpayer in the main tunnel?"

Great---now you want to be too concerned about something that happened in Boston.  Magical---but that still doesn't satify me in regards to you 110% worrying about anything other than METRO.

Keep trying, though.

# May 6, 2008 8:12 PM

DominicMazoch said:

Actyally, I DO call the trains along the LRT "Trams"; I've been doing it from the time the line opened.  I am going to have to look at the history of the word, but I do think it is a common word in Europe for LRT.

And was not the "Big Dig" the moving of IH-95 underground?  (Just asking!)

# May 7, 2008 2:54 PM

DominicMazoch said:

Stray Current Dept (Real):

1.  The possibility of stray current on the LRT:  I can believe it.

2.  The possibility it is the ONLY stray current in the city......?

Also, I would loved to see some sort of BRT in this city.....Just to prove it CAN be done!

# May 7, 2008 2:58 PM

Royko said:

Mr. Collins,

I merely wanted to know if Parsons has had any unpleasant outcomes with prior transit projects.  If so, why are we to believe the work in Houston will suddenly be free of design flaws, and latent defects.

METREAUX rushed the first tram, and they are anxious to fire up the steam-roller, seemingly to flatten any opposition to the tram extensions.

The costs are significantly higher than they were in 2003, when they duped the voters into approving the "solutions" scheme.  If corners are not cut, they will have to exceed the level of bonds approved in 2003.  There are some nagging questions.

# May 7, 2008 5:33 PM

DominicMazoch said:

Sometimes, I think Hogwarts has wisdom in its four word Latin moto.  In English it says:  Never Wake a Sleeping Dragon.  

# May 7, 2008 10:18 PM

DominicMazoch said:

I think the Curtiba Brazil BRT system is run under a partnership system.  And they run BI-articulated units.

# May 7, 2008 10:20 PM

Cedric Collins said:

Roykeaux,

        Understood but what's going on in Boston should stay there.  If METRO thinks there'll be problems with these Parsons folks, then they should know what to do.  NEVER jump to comclusions!

"METREAUX rushed the first tram, and they are anxious to fire up the steam-roller, seemingly to flatten any opposition to the tram extensions."

Maybe METRO should flatten you.  That would be a great wish for me.  You ARE a great opposition to not just METRORail but all of METRO in general.

Changes can be made without warning; promises can be broken---if it's deemed necessary to do so in order to comply with the feds.

Think about it.

# May 8, 2008 8:20 AM

Cedric Collins said:

Roykeaux said:  "The costs are significantly higher than they were in 2003, when they duped the voters into approving the "solutions" scheme.  If corners are not cut, they will have to exceed the level of bonds approved in 2003.  There are some nagging questions."

That was five years ago.  What's done is done and METRO should move forward---NOT BACKWARD---with what they have planned for the future of transit in Houston.  Just comply with the feds and there won't be any major delays.

Now---BRING ON THOSE NEW BUSES (lots more than what METRO is currently purchasing) AND GET MORE TRAINS (that way, we can see more two-car trains), WILL YA?!

# May 8, 2008 8:30 AM

Royko said:

Mr. Collins,

As enthusiastic as you may be to disregard promises to the public, there are state laws and federal promulgated rules under the US Code that METREAUX must comply with.  Even though they have your blessing, it is hardly the last word on boondoggle urban rail in Houston.

# May 8, 2008 10:04 AM

Cedric Collins said:

Mr. Roykeaux,

            Your point is?  Disregard what promises to what public?  If yould read the fine print (whatever you're reading) and listen to any sudden changes that may look different from the original "fine print," then maybe---JUST MAYBE---things would go a lot smoother around here.

I have already explained in my way why METRO is getting rid of routes that people so-called "REALLY NEED" so I need NOT to explain again.

# May 8, 2008 10:20 AM

Derrick said:

I have no problem with calling light rail cars "trams".  For me, an European who grew up in a non-English-speaking country (as most of you can probably figure it out), "tram" means an electric car moving on railroad tracks put along city streets.  "Trolley", on the other hand, is an electric-powered rubber tire vehicle.

# May 8, 2008 10:36 AM

DominicMazoch said:

Derrick:

In this country and Canada, your "trolley" is called a "trolley bus".

# May 8, 2008 11:08 PM

iride222 said:

Thats the type of idiots in place to run the public transit systems... FTA and Harris County METRO ha!

# May 9, 2008 9:47 PM

Royko said:

1) METREAUX STONEWALLED THE MARCH DATA, RELEASING IT VIA SNAIL MAIL, SEEMINGLY SO THAT THE PUBLIC WOULD NOT KNOW THE NEGATIVE INFORMATION FOR AS LONG AS POSSIBLE.  I HAD FILED A FOLLOW-UP COMPLAINT TO THE COUNTY ATTORNEY AND THE TEXAS AG!!!

2)  According to the Texas Comptroller, METREAUX sales Tax for May 2008 is 7.5% ABOVE May 07, and is 30.99% greater than May 2001.  At the current rate, METREAUX will collect over $515 Million in "Windfall" sales tax revenue, allowing the urban rail robber barons to continue to play MONOPOLY with our precious sales tax resources, yet they will continue to abuse the poor, minority, elderly, and handicapped bus transit dependent riders throughout the service area.

3)  METREAUX Bus Boardings for March 2008 are -8.98% BELOW the May 07 level!  A significant decline in spite of all the press and media hyping the $3.50/gallon price of gasoline, and, after the media was featuring Houstonians subjecting themselves to being herded like "Sheeple" from buses to the boondoggle tram!

4)  METREAUX Fare Box revenue was up, yet the January-March period, when compared with 2004 is still -10.26%.

5)  METREAUXRail TVM revenue for March 2008 is -8.55% off from March 2007!

6)  METREAUXRail estimated "forced" Boardings declined -4.02% from March 2007. Contrary to the propaganda, and where the tram boardings are up +99.01% for the first four months of 2008, when compared with the same heavily promoted start-up in 2004, Houstonians do not appear to enjoy being herded like "Sheeple" onto the Dystopian tram.

7)  METREAUXRail TVM Revenue/Boarding for March 2008 is $0.235.  FY2008 is -5.95% below FY2007, and FY2008 is -22.22% below FY2005!

METREAUX appears to be trying to steam roll the Consent Agreement, and seemingly does not want any negative information released which could cause the public to realize the tram extensions are not going to be as glorious and wonderful as METREAUX want us to believe.

# May 12, 2008 9:33 AM

Cedric Collins said:

More of Roykeaux's whining and complaining.  Amazing!  Just like the freakin' Energizing bunny; it just keeps going---and going---and going---and going---and going---and=>well, you get the idea.

You still think you're representing the poor, minority, elderly, and handicapped bus transit dependent riders throughout the service area, huh?  YOU'RE NOT!  LEARN HOW TO SPEAK FOR YOURSELF!  IF ANYBODY ELSE HAS SOME SORT OF PROBLEM WITH METRO, THAN LET THEM SPEAK UP FOR THEMSELVES!  THEY DON'T NEED YOUR HELP!

Now---BRING ON THOSE NEW BUSES (lots more than what METRO is currently purchasing) AND GET MORE TRAINS (that way, we can see more two-car trains---especially during rush hour and special events), WILL YA?!  Thanks much.

# May 13, 2008 2:38 PM

Royko said:

Mr. Collins,

Here is a link to a cortoon on PARSONS which I hope some might enjoy:

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/horsey/viewbydate.asp?id=350

# May 22, 2008 7:33 AM

Cedric Collins said:

(yawns)  Funny-----NOT!  That's the corniest cArtoon thingy I have ever seen.  NEXT!

# May 29, 2008 9:46 AM
Anonymous comments are disabled