Subscribe to this blog

  • RSS
  • RSS
    Google Reader or Homepage
    del.icio.us Items
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Subscribe with Bloglines
    Subscribe in NewsGator Online

    myFeedster
    Add to My AOL
METRO Names New Contractor for METRO Solutions
Tuesday, April 29, 2008 7:12 PM

 

METRO train with skyline behindCalling it a planned detour on an off-ramp, METRO released Washington Group International (WGI) as its lead facility provider and today named Parsons Transportation Group as its new lead contractor, tasked to do $12 million of work on three light-rail lines by December.

Frank J. Wilson, METRO's president and CEO, said at a news conference that there were a number of reasons for this difficult decision, including WGI's failure to deliver an acceptable and reasonable price for the next phase of construction and its failure to deliver on promises made in its original proposal. WGI also showed a lack of sensitivity to the local small business community, which Wilson said he intends to make right.

"This is neither a setback nor a surprise," said Wilson. "We expect a seamless transition between WGI and Parsons Group with no loss of time and effort. This change does not impact our program schedules, does not impact the program quality."

Wilson said all the development work has been completed by WGI. The work - $77 million in contracts - is now product and property of METRO. WGI has been directed to keep all the subcontractors - about 150 - intact and working.

Wilson said that a contingency had been built into the contract with WGI so that both parties would have go-forward options at the end of a major phase. "We've not been offered a price that we believe is reasonable and justifiable. After a year...it was time to move on," said Wilson.

Asked if Parsons were second choice for METRO, Wilson replied that the three engineering and construction firms that had bid for METRO Solutions work were all world-class firms, and it was like having three first-round draft choices.  

WGI was dropped because "they did not come around on the key principles. They lost the lottery ticket," said Wilson. "We are not going to buckle under a price we don't think is right. Fortunately, we anticipated it. Fortunately, we did our homework."

WGI's relationship with the small and disadvantaged business community and its lack of communication required damage control by METRO, said Wilson. For example, some contractors were told to go home because there was no more work, when in fact, that wasn't true.

"It took weeks for the message to get communicated properly," said Wilson. "We're going to have to do a much better job of communicating and of relating (to small businesses)."

In contrast, Wilson said Parsons understands how to manage a small business program, pointing to the company's experience in Houston of both its airports in which Parsons doubled the required small business participation goal.

 Wilson said this change in contractors would not derail METRO's schedule of completing five light-rail lines by 2012, and pointed out the following achievements that indicate METRO is on schedule:  

 

  • The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) has authorized METRO to go ahead with the engineering of the North and Southeast light-rail lines.
  • The FTA has approved public hearings on the updated environmental impact statement.
  • The FTA has committed to reissue its Record of Decision - final approval for North and Southeast lines by July 3.

"We'll have hearings in May. If we're done in July, and we believe we will be, then in September, we'll start up with the North and Southeast lines. It's very doable," said Wilson. "We're on track, including the cooperation of the FTA."

Although Parsons Group has not signed a deal with METRO yet, Wilson said that's expected. "We have good indication that we're in hot pursuit of that," he said.

Parsons will be giving METRO milestones, pricing out different pieces until it arrives at the total cost. "We expect them to take appropriate risk," said Wilson, adding that METRO does not make a practice of negotiating terms, contracts and prices in public.

A price can change within hours during negotiations, said Wilson, and much of it depends on which party is willing to assume more risk.

"We're tracking exactly what we want. We built a decision point, and we've made one. We're just not sticking to the same contractor, but we are where we want to be," said Wilson.

In fact, tomorrow, METRO will be reviewing five bids on new rail cars.

 

 

Comments

Peter Wang said:

Parsons did a great job with bike racks on the Minneapolis, MN light rail trains.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/94699428@N00/1990346508/

# April 29, 2008 8:12 PM

ChloeMireille said:

Uh-huh....lovely. (Am I properly conveying my skepticism here?)

As soon as the greenlight was given for the Northline and Southeast LRT's, there should have been shovels in the ground right then and there. I'm not seeing where you people have time to waste on this.

I will gladly eat my words if construction on ANY line actually does start in July as planned.

So, now here's the part where I get to be nosy:

1) Have you finally picked rail stops yet for all of the lines?

2) Have you figured out how the routes currently running on the future rail lines will be affected when a) construction starts and b) once the rail is up and running?

3) How many new transit center-like stations will we see from this?

I probably should have put this on the entry for the Friday chat, but I didn't think of this until I got over here, so here it is.

# April 30, 2008 10:16 AM

DominicMazoch said:

I say they should run Signalture/BRT on these new rail routes until it is running.  Then everything will be on line, like route changes and schedules.

# April 30, 2008 10:23 AM

Royko said:

Sounds like a near-miss derailing for METREAUX.

There is no need to rush into this, especially since the COH has not yet granted permission for METREAUX to decimate the businesses in five unsuspecting thoroughfare corridors due to the predictable strangulation of the vehicle traffic, similar to what was done to the Main Street corridor which was so negatively impacted by the construction and operation of the tram.

# April 30, 2008 10:46 AM

Royko #2 said:

My two cents...I will bet fifty bucks nothing changes by 2012 let alone five new light rail lines. Any takers?? I ride the current red line everyday. I really like the train, but unless everything comes in an already assembled box kit 2012 is pretty optimistic.  Maybe they meant to say they will have a model by then.

# April 30, 2008 4:23 PM

Cedric Collins said:

Royo said:  "There is no need to rush into this, especially since the COH has not yet granted permission for METREAUX to decimate the businesses in five unsuspecting thoroughfare corridors due to the predictable strangulation of the vehicle traffic, similar to what was done to the Main Street corridor which was so negatively impacted by the construction and operation of the tram."

Decimate what businesses?  These folks saw it coming and I think it's time to get used to it.  There are ceratin places that are back in business any have more people going there than back in the days of just only buses running along Main downtown.

If you seriously think certain businesses may be doomed, please provide examples.  Are they gone?  Have they lucked out and are now happy again about what's going on around their area?

# May 1, 2008 8:35 AM

Elizabeth said:

Royo said:

"There is no need to rush into this, especially since the COH has not yet granted permission for METREAUX to decimate the businesses in five unsuspecting thoroughfare corridors due to the predictable strangulation of the vehicle traffic, similar to what was done to the Main Street corridor which was so negatively impacted by the construction and operation of the tram."

--------------

I don't know that Metro has caused more businesses to go under than construction on, for example, the Katy Freeway that has been going on forever.  That's part of doing business in a large city - construction happens.

# May 1, 2008 9:55 AM

Steve Palmer said:

I would be extremely skeptical about METRO finishing the planned LRT lines by the target date were it not for the fact that the Red Line was finished exactly when METRO said it would be. Not that I have total confidence, of course--this IS a construction project, after all--but my level of optimism is higher than it would be otherwise.

# May 1, 2008 11:07 AM

Royko said:

Mr. Collins,

How quickly you forget that METREAUX has opened little offices situated in the corridors, seemingly so as to try and fade the heat from the irate business owners.  One would expect the strategy would be to promise them something so as to keep them from complaining to the media, or storming the Lee. P. Brown fortified bunker.

# May 1, 2008 3:26 PM

maria J said:

well yet another fast maneuver by Wilson and company.  when will some investigative reporting be done on this agency that results in exposing what really goes on within Metro.  amazing how wilson shifts metro's screw ups, covers up patronage (not to mention suspension of federal funds) and makes their contractor responsible - who by the way - was their favorite.  Rad you really need to do a better job at ferreting out information on this place for the public good.

# May 1, 2008 5:11 PM

Don G said:

Elizabeth said: "I don't know that Metro has caused more businesses to go under than construction on, for example, the Katy Freeway that has been going on forever.  That's part of doing business in a large city - construction happens."

No comparison Elizabeth.

The I-10 project actually reinvigorated the corridor as I have been watching the businesses and access for the past 26 years (I drive on it at least once a day on average...and most days a lot more!).

Item #1: AllQuip Rentals.  They were operatimg out of a rundown OLD building they owned on the North side near Campbell.  The ROW took the front parking so they were paid by TXDOT.  Now, thanks to that money, they have a BRAND NEW building with great access and it is outrside the city limits so taxes are bound to be far lower.

They went from a high energy loss building to energy efficient and improved their business.

Item #2: Igloo.  They had a REALLY OLD building complex at Beltway 8 and TXDOT bought them out to build a huge detention pond.  They now are OUT OF THE CITY out in Ft Bend County in another BRAND NEW building that was built specifically for their business and is far nore energy efficient.

Item #3: Home Depot. The strip where Home Depot is now has a large group of brand new retail spaces on land that was vacant and igly before.

Item #4: Massive redevelopment of brown land on North side between Bunker Hill and Gessner.

This land sat vacant since I came here and had all kinds of trash of oil related trash on it.  Now it is being built into a really large retail development...aka, massive tax revenue for the city (and Metro gets 1% of that btw).

Item #5: Marqe' Movie Complex.  At Silber, this entertainment complex lost a bunch of parking places so TXDOT paid to build them a 4 story parking garage and stipulated that it had to be FREE.  \

Not only did this complex get superior access and new wider roads, they now have parking for rainy days and easier access....all for free.

That project, BTW, was purcahsed right after the start of I-10 by Magic Johnson Enterprises as well as a huge piece of land directly behind it.

Item #6: Courtesy Chevrolet.  They had a rinkiedink building on the South side and it was torn down.  Now a large parking garage is being built and I am not sure what is going in.  Courtesy said they were going to rebuild and this could be them.

The point is that the new project is vastly superior to the REALLY OLD builind previously there.

The list could go on and on.

Later I'll revist the facts on Main Street before and after rail.  My wifes boss owns a bunch of properties down town and the one on Main in the 800 block has higher taxes by NO takers.  Two others in the 100 block are the same. One had a bar and now has another bar but the upper floors remain VACANT and have been for the past 4 years.

# May 1, 2008 5:26 PM

Royko said:

Ms Sit,

I will not be able to participate in the chat this noon, can I submit this question?

"Mr. Wilson, in light of the Texas Medical Center filing a lawsuit against the transit agency over the stray current leakage from the shoddily-constructed tram system, won't this destroy the credibility of your agenciy's statements to the City of Houston and the public, that there is no damage being caused by the tram (it's like a 9-volt battery)?

# May 2, 2008 9:07 AM

Royko said:

# May 22, 2008 7:20 AM
Anonymous comments are disabled