Subscribe to this blog

  • RSS
  • RSS
    Google Reader or Homepage
    del.icio.us Items
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Subscribe with Bloglines
    Subscribe in NewsGator Online

    myFeedster
    Add to My AOL

Tags

More Commuters Using Public Transportation
Thursday, October 04, 2007 4:30 PM  

Interior of people sitting on trainMore people are taking public transportation this year than last with commuter rail seeing the highest rate of growth.

That's according to a survey released today by the American Public Transportation Association, a trade organization that advocates public transit.

Most commuters are taking mass transit to get to work (59.2 percent) and to school (10.7 percent) - and 30 percent said this was the first year they had taken public transportation.

Americans took 78 million more trips on public transit in the first six months of this year, compared to the same period last year. That translates to more than 5 billion trips nationwide - a 2.3 percent increase in the second quarter and a 1.1 percent increase in the first quarter, compared to the same periods a year ago.

"The increased public transit ridership we are seeing this year clearly shows that people want travel choices," said William W. Millar, APTA president, in a statement.

Four cities saw double-digit increases in commuter rail, including our neighbor to the north - Dallas at 17 percent. Others included Harrisburg, Penn., Miami and Oakland.

Light rail, which included modern light rail, street cars, trolleys and heritage trolleys, saw the second-highest percentage of ridership growth with a 4.1 percent increase. Denver led the increase, with St. Louis and New Orleans following.

Here in Houston, METRORail increased 3.4 percent for the first ten months of fiscal year 2007, compared to the year before, same period, with 10.7 million boardings.

Heavy rail - or subways - grew nationally by 2.8 percent in the first six months of this year. The largest increases were in Atlanta, the state of New Jersey, Staten Island, N.Y. and San Francisco.

More commuters rode buses than they did last year nationally with an increase of 0.6 percent. The largest increases occurred in Seattle, Minneapolis and Denver.

Who's riding the rail and bus?

APTA released a second survey on passenger demographics based on 150 on-board vehicle passenger surveys, summarized by transit agencies of more than 496,000 commuters from 2000 to 2005.

Here's a snapshot of who is riding:

 

  • 30 percent said they were first-timers.
  • 57.1 percent said they had been riding more than two years.
  • Eight out of ten trips are by riders who commute three or more days a week.
  • Nearly two-thirds of trips are by travelers who take transit five or more days a week.
  • Riders come from all ethnic backgrounds: Caucasian (41%); African American (33%); and Hispanic (14.3%).
  • Women outnumber men commuters with a 55-45 percent split.
  • More than one-third of all riders have household income of $50,000 or more (34.3%). Almost 10 percent have household incomes of $100,000 or more. Almost half report household incomes ranging from $15,000 to $49,999 (45.6%).

 

To read the entire report, click here. Man commuting, holding briefcase

Here at METRO, ridership decreased in the first 10 months of fiscal year 2007 (our fiscal year starts Oct. 1). From October 2006 to July 2007, METRO recorded 88.7 million boardings, down 2 percent from a year ago, same period.

It's important to remember that in fiscal year 2006, METRO posted its highest single-year ridership in its history with 98.5 million passenger boardings on our fixed-route service.

Total fixed-route services include rail. Every time someone steps on a bus or train, it's a passenger boarding.

Many factors play into why METRO's ridership numbers declined, including record rainfalls this year. From January 1 to July 20, Houston had the wettest period on record, according to meteorologist Tim Heller of KTRK-TV. The more it rains here, the less people seem to catch the bus.

 

 

Posted by Mary Sit
Filed under:

Comments

ChloeMireille said:

"The more it rains here, the less people seem to catch the bus."

When you read it, it sounds completely backwards and illogical.

When you SEE it, it makes perfect sense. So many stops don't have shelters, or even seats. (I know, I know, it's expensive.) Plus, no one wants to go out in the rain if they're going to have to walk 2 or 3 blocks to get to the bus, especially if they're going to the store. And I know everyone just loves it when people bring wet grocery bags on the bus.

# October 5, 2007 9:22 AM

Steve Palmer said:

In addition to the factors that ChloeMireille mentioned, people are probably less likely to travel in the rain (especially heavy rain) no matter what mode of transportation they use. That is, some people avoid taking nonessential trips (eg, going to the movies or to an exercise class) in the rain no matter whether they would be driving a car or riding a bus.

# October 5, 2007 11:14 AM

Royko said:

Ms. Sit,

There was a bus boarding spike for FY2006 due to the Katrina refugees, but bus boardings had been trending down each year since METRO hired Shirley DeLibero, and METRO headed down that slippery slope of diverting precious taxpayer resources away from critical bus service towards wasteful urban rail.

Nevertheless, since the 2000 census, the Harris County population has increased about 500,000 as of January 1, 2007; and, this figure does not include the unknown hoards of illegal aliens residing in Houston.  Therefore, one should expect the number of bus transit dependent riders to have increased, not decline as it has each month for the past 12 months.

There is no logical explanation other than METRO's rail-centric policy causing once bus dependent riders to fond another way to get around Houston.

The Harris County Tax Assessor/Collector reports vehicle registrations increased again last year, to a record number of rubber-tired vehicles.

A recent report, using 2005 data indicates METRO only provides 0.9% of trips.  Squandering more precious taxpayer money on an ill-devised wasteful urban rail empire solves nothing as far as mobility.

It is clear Houstonians do not rely on METRO.

# October 5, 2007 5:41 PM

Cedric Collins said:

"It is clear Houstonians do not rely on METRO."

If Houstonians don't rely on METRO---as you so happily claim, then how come there isn't more cars on the road than you think?  PLEASE---enlighten us on that.  To me, more cars = more accidents, more deaths due to ignorant people who may not know how to drive, etc.  Sorry but I choose life over death so TAs like METRO need to figure out better ways to get more cars off the road.  Thank you!!!

# October 5, 2007 8:08 PM

Royko said:

Mr. Collins,

There are more cars on Harris County roads than ever before!

I suppose there would be more if METRO tried to save some money and leased a new BMW for every tram rider.

# October 5, 2007 10:46 PM

Lunk said:

Royko,

I have noticed on this site that you bash METRO's rail anytime you can.  I'm curious to know what alternative's you have in mind?  I may be new here, so maybe I haven't seen all your posts. Do you want to keep expanding the pavement and thus the autos on the roads?  How do you feel about the proposed HOT (High Occupancy Toll) Lanes?  Are you willing to pay to drive downtown?  Are you opposed to commuter rail also, or just the rapid transit?

Just trying to see where you are coming from.

# October 6, 2007 1:10 AM

Fallen668 said:

Ryoko's stance is that Metro is too rail centric and eliminating bus routes that people were actually using to make them use the rail to boost its' numbers.  Metro is spending too much money on the train that doesnt serve the people as well as buses would.  

A route that I used to personally take everyday to work and back fell victim to a train reorginization to make people who would ride it ride the train.  Now when I get off of work in a few minutes (5:00A.M. SAT), I will be stuck with a one hour and 35 minute trip which includes a mile walk between the two buses when before the service "adjustment" the trip was 40 minutes.  This is only on saturday and sunday mornings mind you but on the weekdays I have to take the train now.  Befroe the service adjustment all I had to do was take 1 bus... but I guess somehow that didn't work right for metro.  

If I could drive, which I legally can not, I would never step foot on a bus again because of the way they treat their users. Sure the two rush hour periods "might" be great if you need to go somewhere, but the rest of the day and especially weekends it is horrible trying to get anywhere.  

# October 6, 2007 4:59 AM

Royko said:

Lunk,

You want the truth?  Some can't handle the truth!

I have been following the METRO debacle since Lee. P. Brown, who wanted the "Brown Streak" boondoggle as a perverse legacy, and appointed the BOD's who hired Shirley the "Liar" DeLibero.

Bus boardings, fare box recovery, and METRO itself in my view, have trended down since then.

The over-priced, shoddily-built, unsafe, unreliable, and underutilized tram, which can not ford a mere 3-inches of storm water in the bayou city which averages over 46-inches in rainfall, was declared our "Transit Backbone."

Being from Chicago, you should know Baloney when you see it.

If you look carefully, you will see METRO is now run like a "Monopoly" game so as to expand a 3rd-world-class urban rail empire, which directly abuses the poor, minority, elderly and handicapped bus transit dependent riders throughout the service area.

COupled with the current autocratic "limousine Liberal" Mayor what we have here is akin to "Animal Farm - Houston."

# October 6, 2007 6:50 AM

Cedric Collins said:

"There are more cars on Harris County roads than ever before!"

Royko,

      That's the problem but I suppose you may NOT know that your "precious" money goes into wasting time trying to build more freeways for those cars and trying to maintain the ones that are already built---especially the BRIDGES!  Also, there's NOT enough law enforcement personnel to "handle" people who just loves to get away with traffic crimes.  That's what I think money needs to be spent on---MORE COPS!

"I suppose there would be more if METRO tried to save some money and leased a new BMW for every tram rider."

Why in God's name would METRO want to do something stupid like that for?  I don't get it.  Actually, I don't want to get it because it makes no sense.

(You want the truth?  Some can't handle the truth!

I have been following the METRO debacle since Lee. P. Brown, who wanted the "Brown Streak" boondoggle as a perverse legacy, and appointed the BOD's who hired Shirley the "Liar" DeLibero.

Bus boardings, fare box recovery, and METRO itself in my view, have trended down since then.

The over-priced, shoddily-built, unsafe, unreliable, and underutilized tram, which can not ford a mere 3-inches of storm water in the bayou city which averages over 46-inches in rainfall, was declared our "Transit Backbone."

Being from Chicago, you should know Baloney when you see it.

If you look carefully, you will see METRO is now run like a "Monopoly" game so as to expand a 3rd-world-class urban rail empire, which directly abuses the poor, minority, elderly and handicapped bus transit dependent riders throughout the service area.

COupled with the current autocratic "limousine Liberal" Mayor what we have here is akin to "Animal Farm - Houston.")

Can you speak for yourself?  Note:  WHO CARES?!

"...in my view"  Do you know that this is the smartest thing you have said?  Kudos to that!

"Ryoko's stance is that Metro is too rail centric and eliminating bus routes that people were actually using to make them use the rail to boost its' numbers.  Metro is spending too much money on the train that doesnt serve the people as well as buses would."

So funny, I forgot to laugh.  If your fellow citizens would learn how to ride the doggone routes that METRO wasted their time putting out there, then those routes would still be here today.

"If I could drive, which I legally can not, I would never step foot on a bus again because of the way they treat their users. Sure the two rush hour periods "might" be great if you need to go somewhere, but the rest of the day and especially weekends it is horrible trying to get anywhere."

Good for you.  Unfortunately, I'm on the same boat as you are---meaning---not being able to drive but even if I did, I still would use METRO because of where I need to go.  I rather waste money on METRO than wasting money on a vehicle---especially if you're wanting to drive anything that's labeled as a "gas guzzler."

All in all, what y'all people need to do is stop trying to be like the news and help rather than hinder because what you may say won't get ya anywhere.  If METRO wants to listen and somehow bow down to some of y'alls demands and screw up people who really want to ride---like me, I may never ride the bus again.

# October 16, 2007 1:56 PM
New Comments to this post are disabled