Subscribe to this blog

  • RSS
  • RSS
    Google Reader or Homepage
    del.icio.us Items
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Subscribe with Bloglines
    Subscribe in NewsGator Online

    myFeedster
    Add to My AOL

Tags

Cutting the Customer Hold Time with High Tech & High Touch
Friday, February 09, 2007 5:43 PM

 

No matter how good the music sounds, no one likes to wait “on hold” when calling a company.

If you’re calling METRO, you may be shivering at the bus stop, wondering when the next bus is coming and calling in to our main information number. Or maybe you’re trying to plan a trip from East Houston to The Galleria. Or you’re upset that the bus came early – and you missed it and got to work late.

In 2005, if you were one of those callers, you were probably fuming by the time a customer information specialist got to you. The average wait time to speak to a real person: 4:46.

A year later in 2006, the average wait time for a customer to speak to a rep had shrunk to 1:16.

“When we became better at picking up our phones, we started getting comments, ‘Oh, ya’ll are quick.’ They were in a state of shock,” says Kim Wells, manager of customer services.

What happened?

Wells, who has been at METRO for eight years and worked in customer service at American Express before coming here, credits the reduced wait time to these factors:

  • New technology for the call center
  • Implementing a Trip Planner system - software that simplifies how reps retrieve route and schedule information for customers
  • Starting an Automated Route time point information for riders who can press various numbers on their phone keypad and listen to information without having to speak to a rep.

 Readerboard“Frank Wilson held us to a challenge,” recalls Wells. “That’s what I like about him. He challenges you to do the impossible, and you have to figure out how to do it. He challenged us and said he would like (hold time) to be under a minute. While we didn’t make it under a minute, we got really close. One reason why we didn’t’ make it was the large increase in calls in 2006.”

METRO reduced the training period of new reps, condensing the same material to to four weeks to get the reps working the phones faster. In 2006, the staff answered an average of 117,200 calls a month. New reps fresh from training took an average of 12 calls an hour. Reps with six months to one year’s experience averaged 22 calls an hour, while reps with one year or more of experience averaged 25 to 35 calls an hour.

As manager, Wells had to change business practices that existed when she took over as manager. She issued a clear message to the reps: It was critical that everyone arrived at work on time and took their two 15-minute scheduled breaks and one-hour lunch on time.

“They’re actually penalized if they’re late. After so many times being tardy, there are written reprimands, suspension and termination,” explains Wells.

“In the beginning, there was a lot of resistance. We lost a lot of people - 60 to 70 percent. They didn’t like change,” says Wells.

At the same time the more professional approach was emphasized, Wells had to build up morale in a high turnover department stressed out by hearing complaints hour after hour.

She started performance and attendance incentives, peer recognition, teams of reps who competed against other teams for prizes like movie tickets or an extra 15 minutes off. Liza Babineaux

Employees voluntarily pool their money to celebrate birthdays in the department. There’s a monthly cake - or sometimes ice cream. On each individual’s birthday, his or her cubicle is decorated with colorful balloons. Birthday honorees get a goodie bag stuffed with items they requested – from paperback books to chocolates.  Liza Babineaux, at the right, enjoys the department's camaraderie.

The first week of October during National Customer Service week, Wells goes all out to give her staff red-carpet treatment. “We feed them. We basically pamper them. We do ice cream parties for them, we bring in barbeque. We make the most of the dollars we’ve budgeted, “ says Wells, who loves to plan theme parties. “At the same time, we’re passing out customer service brochures. We send them to classes that week if there are national classes going on.”

While she’s doing these feel-good activities with her staff, Wells emphasizes the biggest element to reducing caller hold time. ”The biggest thing is communicating the expectations - creating performance expectations and communicating them to the staff – and holding them accountable, “says Wells.

The turnover rate at METRO is less than 20 percent, in line with industry standards.

 Ms. OrtegaThe call center is staffed Monday through Friday, 6 a.m. to 9 p.m. and on weekends and holidays, 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. The majority of calls are for trip planning help; then questions about when the next bus is arriving; complaints, fares and first-time bus rider help each makes up 10 percent of the calls.

Wells says customers can often get the same information without any hold time if they use the automated option when they call.

METRO has 38 reps. Twelve speak Spanish – and METRO is always looking for more. To the left is Natividad Ortega, a bi-lingual agent who has been with us seven years. Reader boards hanging from the ceiling show stats that look like ticket tape info. It displays the number of calls waiting, the number of minutes the longest call has been waiting, how many reps are staffing the call center; and the service level.

“Customers expect for us to answer the phones. We’ve gotten good at it. It’s just something that we do,” says Wells. “We have fun. You have to laugh. We’re not perfect. We’re working on getting there. If you can make the staff happy at work, it makes it a much better place for everybody to work. I really try to focus on that – while still holding them to high expectations.”

Her formula must be working. In an often thankless job dealing with irate customers all day long, any of the 38 reps will come in after their normal hours when Wells needs them.

“Right now, I can get anybody to work overtime,” says Wells, adding that everyone she called during Hurricane Rita came in to work when she asked.

Comments

Sizzling Sallie said:

Once upon a time the world was a great place   and Houston   was THE city to live in and the place to call HOME was near public transportation because: 1) you didn't drive 2) you couldn't afford a car 3) you heard Houston had really bad drivers 4) you heard Houston had really nice, cute bus drivers So...you found a place to call HOME near, not one but, two bus lines   which stopped two blocks from HOME and a major league pitcher's stone's throw away from WORK. Life was good. You had it all. Bus service started at 5AM and continued until about 11PM; on weekends buses only ran every half hour but you learned how to time yourself. And you could still go to concerts and plays and sports events on campus. Then the evil planners   came. With their simple minds they wanted to simplify the routes   ; with their accommodating grins   they said they wanted to accommodate street changes but not for the people   who rode those buses. Did they ask us what buses we took or what we needed? NO! Did they check their usage statistics to see how much the bus routes were used? We don't think so. They changed the routes and now, not two, not one, but NO direct bus service   goes from downtown to campus. You have to transfer (evil word). Where, before--all my life, my work, my interests took place; now—I have to spend twice as much time  getting to and from work AND I have to leave by 8:37PM to make an easy transfer to the rail system or I can stay later and take something else to the transit center   and wait again for another bus to take me somewhere near what was HOME. Why is your transfer bus scheduled to leave 2 minutes before your connecting bus arrives at the transit center? Weekends are even worse: Sundays I have to leave by 6:33PM. This doesn't leave me much time to go to church   , come to school, go to a friend's recital   , and get some of my own work done  . And then there is all the checking bus schedules—maybe I should try the old #30 on the new #30 route and transfer to the #42 nearer campus. Why, if it's not raining   , cold or windy  , or incredibly hot   I could walk those blocks. It would be good exercise. Should I move? Should I learn how to drive? Should I get out of Houston? Maybe I should run for the transit board. Why does a major city transportation system  force its passengers to consider all the alternatives to riding its system because it has chosen to streamline its services so much that it no longer provides them? Why, Houston, are we putting up with this? If we are going to be a major metropolitan community, we need public transportation and we need one that works for the people, not the planners.
# February 9, 2007 6:33 PM

Henry Ramsey said:

Well, you *still* have callers waiting on hold more than 5 minutes.  Back in the late summer of 2006 I tried the customer service phone number on a Sat afternoon from a payphone. I was calling to make a complaint about a bus driver who absolutly refused to open the door of the bus for me and several other people inspite of his bus being only partly full.  It cost me $3 in change to get nothing more than elevator music on hold!  By that time 25 Minutes later the next bus had arrived. There have been other times where the wait time has been several minutes too.  
# February 9, 2007 10:52 PM

PubliusTX said:

>>In 2005, if you were one of those callers, you were probably fuming by the time a customer information specialist got to you. The average wait time to speak to a real person: 4:46.

A year later in 2006, the average wait time for a customer to speak to a rep had shrunk to 1:16. <<

This is another one of those PR features stories that makes METRO sound great compared to an earlier point in time, but what would be really handy for your next PR features post is to try to make some comparisons with other transit agencies and their call response times.

That is to say, how are call times with the Chicago Transit Authority? In Dallas? In San Francisco? Etc.

That way, people get some sense not just that METRO isn't failing as miserably as it was at some sorry point in the past, but how METRO compares with some other transit organizations across the country.

In addition -- since you obviously spent some time digging through numbers, it would be nice if you could update your post to provide the median hold time along with the mean (average) hold time, AND provide the standard deviation. That would give people a much better sense of performance.

# February 10, 2007 11:41 AM

J. Liggins said:

I really do not have anything good to say about Metro's customer service division. Hopefully all of this high tech wizardry that has been put in place on the 4th floor has changed some attitudes up there as well. Also, hopefully the trainers are kept up to date on route and destination sign changes as well and know the freeway system as well as their students... But anywhoodles; any improvement is a good one. Though I prefer the automated system over the live person, it's much faster in my opinion.
# February 10, 2007 11:51 PM

tyw said:

If you think it is bad at the big bus try calling the dispatch office metrolift. you either get put on hold or get hung in the cue. however the wait time makes no sence.
# February 11, 2007 3:38 AM

Rorschach said:

Sallie, if only you could "run for the transit board" but you see the METRO board is not elected, and therefore is not answerable to the public. It is instead appointed by both the county judge and the city of Houston mayor. Invariably those who are chosen are major campaign contributors or "friends" of the two. Therein lies what is fundamentally wrong with METRO.
# February 11, 2007 8:51 PM

Rorschach said:

You know, if METRO had not torn out all the three sided bus shelters and replaced them with the ones that don't keep the wind and/or the rain off of the customers, maybe they would not be cold, wet, and shivering.
# February 12, 2007 3:47 PM
Anonymous comments are disabled