Subscribe to this blog

  • RSS
  • RSS
    Google Reader or Homepage
    del.icio.us Items
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Subscribe with Bloglines
    Subscribe in NewsGator Online

    myFeedster
    Add to My AOL

Tags

HOV Lanes: When Two-plus Becomes Three-plus
Thursday, February 01, 2007 5:01 PM

Loyd SmithAnyone who carpools during peak traffic hours on the 290 HOV lane knows how the traffic crawls – at certain times and in certain spots. Several of you have written in, asking when we’re going to change the occupancy requirements in the peak morning and evenings hours from two or more occupants to three or more occupants.

“It’s being considered, but we don’t have a timetable established,” said Loyd Smith, director of transportation systems at METRO. “It’s a significant change because those people who are using the HOV lane in the 5 p.m. to 6 p.m. hour with two persons would be impacted. There’s a significant number of those. They would either have to get in before 5 p.m. or get a third person.”

But the traffic management gurus here know that the Houston traffic can back up and be as slow as the main lanes. In fact, they have assigned a grade “D” to that lane. Traffic engineers give grades to rank the type of traffic flow (A to F, just like school report cards).  A level of service D means “approaching unstable traffic flow; minor incidents cause traffic queing.”

 When a lane rates a D, it’s time to do something.

 

  Level of Service (LOS) Definitions for Roadways

LOS

Traffic Flow

A

Free flow speeds; low volumes

B

Reasonable free flow speeds with speeds being affected by traffic volumes

C

Stable traffic flow with limitations on traffic maneuvers

D

Approaching unstable traffic flow; minor incidents cause traffic queuing

E

Unstable flow; volume at or near roadway capacity;

F

Forced flow; long traffic queues and significant delay

Source:  2000 Highway Capacity Manual

 

For U.S. 290, METRO has consistently measured 1,500 vehicles an hour from 5 p.m. to 6 p.m. In the mornings from 7 a.m. to 8 a.m., when the occupancy rules require three or more persons, the lane carries 1,350 vehicles an hour.

Before the morning rules were changed a few years ago, the volumes carried from 7 a.m. to 8 a.m. were higher. “The difference illustrates a downside of changing to a three-person requirement: The use of the lane will be reduced somewhat at the time when the congestion and delay in the mainlane is at its worst,” explained Smith.

“We know from experience that 1,500 vehicles per hour is near a “tipping point” where a small increase in volume can begin to negatively affect travel speeds,”  Smith added. “In general roadway planning, capacity and volume carried a higher weight in the evaluation process than speed.”

But at METRO, we value speed, too. After all, if buses – which use the HOV lanes – can’t meet their schedules on time, we’ve got a busload of unhappy passengers.

“For us, because the travel time savings and reliability are the service we’re providing, we’re sensitive to that to a higher degree,” Smith said. But he noted that the overall travel time savings on the HOV lane is the key evaluation factor, not just maintaining operating speeds at or near the speed limits over the entire length of the trip.

 “Even on the a day when the 290 HOV lane traffic has a segment that drops to 30 mph or less, we often find that the overall time savings from the Cypress area to downtown will still be between 15 to 20 minutes,” Smith said.  

Although the Texas Department of Transportation owns the roads and the dirt, METRO manages and maintains the HOV lanes.

Take a look at the numbers and you’ll see that HOV lanes have grown successfully in the past eight years. System-wide, all HOV lanes carry 45,000 vehicles a day. Of those, 94 percent are carpools, 2 percent buses, 2 percent vans and 2 percent motorcycles. System-wide, the HOV lanes carry 135,000 passengers daily.

Only 65 percent of those are in carpools; 32 percent on buses; 3 percent on vans and 1 percent on motorcycles. From 1998 to 2006, there’s been a 70 percent increase in vehicles and volume, said Smith.

So what factors go into deciding when an HOV lane changes from allowing carpools with two or more to vehicles with at least three or more?

Smith says four elements come into play:

  • Consistent degrading of travel times. “The trends have to point to this – that it is not incident-based or short-term because of a construction detour. It has to be a true trend that consistently impacts traffic,” said Smith.

  • Rigorous enforcement of HOV lanes.

If cheaters with less than the required number of occupants sneak on, they slow the lane down for everyone else. The METRO Police’s use of motorcycle cops to catch the bad guys (as described in Tuesday’s blog),  along with the public reporting cheaters on the HERO Hotline,  are both helping to increase the number of citations issued to HOV violators.

  • Impact on METRO buses.

METRO analyzes what’s happening with buses that use the HOV lanes, both from a financial and a service perspective.  “Bus users are just like the carpoolers,” said Smith. “If we hear from our customers and our bus supervisors who are measuring more late buses, those things are concrete evidence that the speeds are being affected,” said Smith.

  • The physical environment of the HOV lane itself.

Is construction being planned near or around it? For example, there have been numerous changes to the Katy Freeway (and the Katy HOV lane) over the past few years as TxDOT’s reconstruction project has proceeded. HOV Map

For the U.S. 290 HOV lane users traveling from downtown, the progress of the Katy Freeway construction, the changes to the Old Katy Road near the Northwest Transit Center and the loss of a ramp directly connecting the mainlanes to the 290 HOV entrance have all caused afternoon travel times to fluctuate.

 Because METRO considers a change to a 3+ rule a permanent change, it’s important to confirm that the state of the nearby roadway capacity is stable at the time of the change.

 

“If I knew that ramp were going to be opening up tomorrow, that would attract more people to the 290 because presently to get on 290 HOV, you must travel on Katy Road through the Northwest Transit Center or the brand new ramp built by TxDot,” said Smith. “That has somewhat of a negative effect on the number of people who use the HOV lane because there have been delays due to construction. If (TxDot) opened the ramp, the volume would jump up more. We would be at that tipping point and go forward.”

 

“When - in the timeline of a constantly changing travel environment - do you pull the trigger and make an occupancy change when it’s warranted? Ultimately, it’s a judgment call,” said Smith, agreeing that it’s part science, part art. “We want the lanes to operate and to operate well.”

Posted by Mary Sit
Filed under:

Comments

DominicMazoch said:

I think there might be a short term solution to the problem.  The merge area at the end of the lane just north of the NW Station P&R lot is way too short.  Also, the lane could be extended slightly, anybe with wands, to people will not stop trying to exit at TX6-FM 1960.  Those people could exit at the P&R.

Speaking of the HOV.  People exiting the lane are causing a backup at West Road and Jones.  Some mobility money could be given to Harris County to incease left turn lanes, et. al.

# February 1, 2007 7:55 PM

Bus Rider said:

There is currently an online petition to TXDOT to extend a Diamond Lane or a Bus Lane from the end of the HOV at FM 1960 out to Cypress.  According to the comment on the petition of those who signed it is desparately needed.   I moved to out to Barker Cypress 5 years ago this year and I have watched traffic dramatically increase every year.  Now traffic starts to back up around Barker Cypress very early in the morning.

Please sign the petition and forward the following weblink to your friends and family whether you live on 290 or elsewhere.

The petition link is http://www.petitiononline.com/290Diamd/petition.html

# February 2, 2007 10:46 AM

Mary Sit said:

Once a lane goes from two-plus to three-plus, there's another option you can take if you can't get three or more to carpool with you, and you want to use an HOV lane: Ride a METRO bus.

There are three Park & Ride routes that operate on the Northwest Freeway (US290) serving the CBD (Routes 214 Northwest Station, 216 West Little-York Pinemont and 217 HP/Cypress) as well as one route that serves Uptown / Greenway (Route 286 West Little York – Northwest Transit Center / Uptown – Greenway).  

# February 2, 2007 11:05 AM

girlfriend142 said:

The Katy Freeway has been crazy with traffic ever since I can remember. There has been talk about the Texas Department of Transportation increasing the number of lanes since the late 1980's. So in the 2000's they have decided to do something about it. That just means more people stuck in traffic. If you live near the Katy Freeway and work downtown it only makes since to go to a P&R and ride METRO. I would rather save 15-20 minutes off of my ride and let someone else get stressed out about the traffic.      

# February 2, 2007 2:55 PM

yamadude said:

The turn at 290 & west rd is dangerous, esp for 1st time riders who often mistaken the 15mph turn sign for what is actually really is in this case.

# February 8, 2007 3:53 PM

Cypressboy said:

There's really no need to upgrade the requirement to three people, I'd suggest that you get the Metro Police Department to enforce the two people requirement on the outbound trip.  And, I don't mean by sitting at the NW Transit or Dacoma Entrance.  They need to get out to the other end of the HOV where it ends, and ticket the heck out of every vehicle with one passenger.  The problem in the afternoon, is all the single rider cars get on at Pienmont and W Little York, and this unfortunately backs up the entire HOV.  All those single passenger vehicles DO NOT HAVE Passes.

# February 9, 2007 9:39 AM

Shawn said:

Cypressboy said, "All those single passenger vehicles DO NOT HAVE Passes." Can anyone point my to information on the pass? I've asked METRO through the website, but of course no one will reply.
# February 9, 2007 2:02 PM

Shawn said:

Anyone?

# February 21, 2007 7:30 AM

Scott B said:

METRO'S Board of Directors approved the selection of a company to assist in the conversion of the High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes to High Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes.

I have a question regarding HOT lanes.

Riders must either pay or have at least an adequate number of accompanying riders in the vehicle with the driver. What if the vehicle meets the high occupancy requirement but also has a toll-tag used for paying. How does one deactivate the toll-tag when it is not needed to pay? It would be unfair for a driver to have to pay when they already meet the high occupancy limit.

# February 27, 2007 9:17 AM

agarwal said:

I have seen single riders on HOV numerous times. It is about time something should be done to apprehend such commuters on 290 HOV. I take 290 HOV in morning and evening. I believe if Metro Police can cut down on single riders, it will go a long way to clean the road. In morning, single riders either exit out Pinemont or Dacoma. During evening, they enter either at Pinemont or Little York. I have hardly seen a Metro Police catching the culprits. More people see single riders riding for free on HOV, more it entices them to join them. Please TAKE SOME ACTION.

# February 27, 2007 4:43 PM
New Comments to this post are disabled