Subscribe to this blog

  • RSS
  • RSS
    Google Reader or Homepage
    del.icio.us Items
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Subscribe with Bloglines
    Subscribe in NewsGator Online

    myFeedster
    Add to My AOL

Tags

HOV Lanes: No Dummies Allowed
Tuesday, January 30, 2007 6:30 PM

 

Officer John Chaney stood next to his shiny, black Harley-Davidson police cruiser as cars and trucks zipped past us in the early morning drizzle and talked about the job he loves – and the drivers who love him back.

Officer John ChaneyChaney, a METRO police officer for 13 years, has been assigned for the past two years to enforcement of the HOV lanes – high occupancy lanes that allow carpoolers to speed through gridlock on a dedicated lane.

“I usually catch 15 to 20 (violators) a day,” said Chaney, a friendly cop whose 300-pound, 6 foot-three frame would deter anyone from sneaking on the HOV lanes. “I’ve had days with three after sitting here for two hours. On the Katy, there are a lot of violators. Some of them look at it (the fine) like a toll. It’s sad.”

But drivers who obey the rules love it when Chaney – and the nine other METRO police officers assigned to the HOV lanes – crack down and catch the cheaters.

The rules are posted clearly at the entrance of each HOV lane: 

No trailers

No trucks with more than two axels or a weight capcity of one ton or more

No single occupancy

The exception to single occupants includes on-duty law enforcement vehicles; METRO/TxDOT operational or maintenance vehicles; and motorcycles. For a complete list of what’s allowed, go here.

Chaney, 44, says he has a fan club of commuters on Highway 6 who applaud when they see him riding his Harley (model SLHTPI – large touring, police injected cycle), looking for violators.

“I come out, and they come by and clap,” he said. “They love the fact that I’m out.”

Once, a single driver on the Katy Freeway HOV lane near Park Row spied Chaney on his motorcycle, weaved over lane by lane until he was on the shoulder – and then sped off the exit ramp. That night, another commuter called Chaney at home after getting the officer’s phone number from a mutual friend. The commuter gave Chaney the violator’s license plate number, and Chaney was able to confront the violator and issue a ticket.

The fine ranges from $20 to $200 with the average at $125. The courts decide what the fine will be in each case – and the revenues from tickets go to either the City of Houston or Harris County. METRO does not get any of it.

I wasn’t the only one yesterday standing along busy freeways interviewing cops. METRO staged a media event, inviting print and broadcast reporters to ride-along-with-a-cop and see first-hand how officers enforce the HOV lanes.

Seven television stations, two radio stations and The Houston Chronicle came out for the demonstration. The reporters and camera crews were driven to various enforcement spots along the HOV lanes by officers in the Motorist Assistance Program. These officers troll the highways looking for accidents and stranded drivers and offer free help.

In fact, one television reporter with a MAP officer was delayed while the officer helped a commuter fix a flat.

Officer Jim CordellDuring the 10 or 15 minutes I chatted with Officer Chaney, a five-ton food services truck barreled down the Katy Freeway HOV lane, just under North Post Oak Road. No trucks weighing more than one ton are allowed on the HOV lanes. Chaney’s partner, Officer Jim Cordell, slowing to a stop to join us – suddenly took off again, pursuing the truck.

The truck driver’s excuse? “I have an EZ-Tag,” reported Cordell. The EZ-Tag is for the toll roads. The HOV lanes are not part of the EZ-Tag toll road system. The driver got two citations: One for driving a truck over the weight limit; and another for being a single occupant.

Later at a press conference at Houston TranStar headquarters, Chief Tom Lambert said the number of citations climbed by 54.5 percent in 2006 – to 10,394 from 6,726 citations the year before.

The reason: Officers switched from patrol cars to motorcycles to enforce the HOV lanes. Chief Tom Lambert

“We found that motorcycles tend to be more adaptable,” said Lambert. “We’ve also been listening to the public. When the public calls in with a violation, we listen. People get frustrated when they see others breaking the rules. You can save upwards of 25 minutes by carpooling. The maximum use of HOV helps us manage congestion.”

The most common excuses drivers give when caught are:

“I didn’t know the rules.”
“I’m late to work.”
“I thought I met the occupancy rates.”

Wall Of ShameAnd then there are the really clever drivers who dress up manikins with wigs to pose as passengers. Some drivers dress up large baby dolls and strap them in car seats. Some fluff up pillows and shove a knit top on it, said Lambert. Photos on a poster board dubbed “The Wall of Shame” showed examples of drivers with their dummies.

Although the public may not see a visible presence of officers on the HOV lanes, they’re out there on their Harleys, sometimes hidden by the curve of an exit ramp.

Lambert urged the media to get word out: “We’re listening. We’re doing our best. That’s exactly what we’re trying to do – to get compliance,” he said.

Drivers who notice violators can call the HERO hotline at 713/921.HERO (921.4376) to report the cheaters.

Comments

PubliusTX said:

>>“I usually catch 15 to 20 (violators) a day,” said Chaney, a friendly cop whose 300-pound, 6 foot-three frame would deter anyone from sneaking on the HOV lanes.<<

If that's true, then how does he catch anyone breaking the rules?

His mere presence ought to deter all violators!

Come on now -- this single post of the day was not posted until late in the day. Surely the writing can be better than that.

>>“I come out, and they come by and clap,” he said. “They l love the fact that I’m out.”<<K

They I?

Again, surely this writing can be proofed.

>>And then there are the really clever drivers who dress up manikins with wigs to  pose as passengers. <<

Manikins? I think you mean mannequins.

Maybe METRO now needs to hire an editor for its blogger. Goodness knows how much that will cost taxpayers.

# January 30, 2007 10:06 PM

PubliusTX said:

Whoops, my bad on manikin -- it's an accepted alternate spelling. The other points stand, though. Cheerio.

# January 30, 2007 10:09 PM

duhmoose said:

Why not use cameras to catch HOV violators instead of officers?  If it works so well for preventing violent crime at the Park and Rides, surely it would work to catch violators.  Maybe you could get with Mayor White and get some tips from his red-light camera enforcement.

# January 31, 2007 7:29 AM

Rorschach said:

Duhmoose is right, I'm sure that the lighting could be configured to allow the camera to see into the passenger compartment, even with tinted windows. Of course you'd need high resolution and high speed cameras with heated lens faceplates and/or wipers to be able to be able to obtain a decent image, unlike those cheezy low res Sony cameras you guys are wasting money on.

# January 31, 2007 8:49 AM

Rorschach said:

So let me see if I have this right.

METRO gets no money from this

Nobody dies if an HOV cheat manages to flaunt the system

METRO PD has reassigned people from patrol duty of P&R lots to this program, thereby LOWERING the safety of those who use P&R lots. Where someone could be killed or raped, and not just have their car radio or rims stolen.

I'm sorry, how exactly is this good idea again?

# January 31, 2007 10:52 AM

Rorschach said:

Would it not make more sense to pull officers OFF HOV duty and get ahead of the crime problems at Park and rides first? That is after all where felonies take place. You don't even get a cut of the fine for an HOV cheat, so the entire operation is overhead to you. If you are going to be spending money on overtime, would it not make more sense to spend it where it might actually do some good?

# January 31, 2007 11:31 AM

don said:

Regarding the pregnant lady who was given a ticket for driving on the HOV lane alone, it seems to me that she should qualify for 2 people. At least that's what the pro life, anti-abortion groups think. Life begins at conception they say and in this case I agrre with them. That officer should use a little common sense. The lady should have a good argument in court.

# January 31, 2007 12:39 PM

moniques said:

What about those drivers that have SOV tags?  I don't really understand how those work.  But, what is the point of stopping people if they may have a valid tag to ride the HOV with one person in the vehicle.  And what about those law enforcement officers using the HOV in their own personal vehicle (not on duty)?

# January 31, 2007 12:50 PM

wakester said:

I applaud Metro for monitoring the HOV.  As a user of the 290 HOV lane either riding the bus or in a carpool, I have seen it get overloaded from SOVs and come to a stop.  It is always fun when I am waiting for my Uptown bus at the NW TC watching them pull over people as they exit the HOV.

One more thing, on 290 alot of cheaters use the Pinemont park and ride HOV entrance to avoid the usual stakeouts of NW TC and Dacoma.  Also, in the outbound you see people using the West Little York entrance.

# January 31, 2007 3:21 PM

faz said:

don, you are using ill-reasoned opinions with siding with the pregnant. The officer did the right thing. Pro-life groups don't determine who gets a ticket and who doesn't. Texas STATE LAW says that an unborn fetus is not a person until it is born. I agree with the law. She deserved the ticket.

# January 31, 2007 4:43 PM

faz said:

whoops, i used bad grammar, I meant to say pregnant lady not just pregnant.

# January 31, 2007 4:44 PM

Rorschach said:

State law says that if you cause the death of an unborn child you have committed murder too. But yet abortionists are exempt thanks to misapplied case law by the supreme court. The law on the unborn is a muddle and the definition of whether a unborn child is a person varies depending on the law being applied at the time. There is no consistent definition.

# January 31, 2007 4:54 PM

moniques said:

I will admit that I got on the HOV lane as a SOV.  But, that was because the West Road P&R was full and the Metro police officer told me that I could get on the HOV lane and exit West Little York to park there.  I then got back on the afternoon without any problems.

The SOV tags that Metro provides allows the drivers to park at the Pinemont P&R.  So, how can they crack down on SOV's if they also allow it?

# January 31, 2007 10:53 PM

JeffTheWriter said:

PubliusTX needs to get a life - or an editing job. I laughed my *ss off when he/she had to retract the manikin correction. The story was informative and clearly written. The issues should be the focus here.

P.S. Nice try, but the pregnant lady deserved the ticket...      

# February 1, 2007 9:54 AM

Matt Bramanti said:

JeffTheWriter:

Actually, the story was littered with errors, which have been corrected without note.

These include calling the EZ Tag "E-Z Pass," incorrect math in the number of citations, and the notion that "No trucks weighing more than one ton are allowed on the HOV lanes."

That last one has been replaced with a mention of "axels." Apparently METRO likes figure skating.

# February 1, 2007 12:33 PM

don said:

this is for rorschach. Just wondered if you actually use Metro or just like to gripe.

# February 1, 2007 3:26 PM

Rorschach said:

My wife does, I don't. I CAN'T. It would take me two hours each way to get to work and back if I were to try, and of course since I would have had to reverse direction AND transfer after the 90 minute limit, each transfer would count as a new ride under the new rules. plus I'd be transferring in the middle of Houston's answer to the third world.

But seeing as how I am one of the people paying the taxes, I figure I have pretty good grounds to complain about a waste of money. And when it comes to ensuring the safety of my wife, heck yes I have plenty cause to complain.

# February 1, 2007 3:34 PM

Royko said:

I have been paying sales tax in the METRO service since 1982 yet still have no METRO bus service.  The nearest METRO stop is nearly three miles from our home, which is merely a Park & Pillage Lot.

Yet METRO diverts a disproportionately large amount of precious tax revenue to the unsafe, unreliable, and underutilized METRORail tram.

This unfair allocation of resources is an intentional discrimination against the poor, minority, elderly, and handicapped bus transit dependent riders throughout the service area.

METRO PROMISED a 50% increase in bus service when they duped the voters into approving the "Solutions" scheme back in 2003.  Now, METRO has unilaterally devised a new "Solutions Phase II" scheme which has resulted in repetative and countinuous bus service reductions.

All mention of the original "Solutions" propaganda has dissappeared.  Simply Orwellian.

# February 1, 2007 5:56 PM

gman said:

Over 40,000 passengers a day and it is under utilized? You have to be joking.  Check the stats for other systems.  Check their passenger numbers per miles and compare it to the METRORail.  You will find that the METRORail is the most successful light rail system in the country.

# February 1, 2007 7:50 PM

DominicMazoch said:

Houston is not the only place that has the problem.  The Bay Bridge Oakland-San Francisco has no toll for 4+.  It has it share of dummies (real and owners!)

The law should be changed for impounding cars which have less than 2/3+.  This can be applied for those who abuse the EZ-Tag lanes on the HCTRA system!

# February 1, 2007 8:05 PM

Royko said:

gman,

I'm surprised METRO does not divert the rest of all bus routes, so as to simply force all bus riders to board the tram, then boast that all Houston bus riders love the tram.

One thing is sure, the taxpayers are paying extra for METRO to make such assertions.

METRO's collected revenue per tram boarding has steadilly declined from the initial start-up, when Houstonians then considered it an amusement ride.

Other than the two daily commute periods, the tram is woefully underutilized.  During the commute periods, many of the riders, such as TMC workers, are "encouraged" by employers to park at Smith Lands.  These employees are typically reimbursed with taxpayer subsidized passes.

The City of Houston, last year spent $750K of taxpayer funds for METRO passes, provided to COH employees, up from $720K the year before.  In my view, clearly intended to help METRO boost the tram "body count."

# February 1, 2007 8:28 PM

Royko said:

gman,

here's a little follow-up on my prior post.  Here's some current data concerning METRO operations.  It is curious that I could not get this NEGATIVE December data in January.

NOTE: Bus boardings have declined again in December.  The 1st Qtr FY2007 (22,188,500) is -2.89% below the same period in FY2006 (22,870,200).

Fare box revenue likewise declined in December.  The 1st Qtr FY2007 ($12,168,000) is -2.01% below the same period in FY2006 ($12,417,000).

Tram boardings have declined again in December.  The 1st Qtr FY2007 (2,706,100) is -0.92% below the same period in FY2006 (2,731,100).

Ticket Vending Machine (TVM)* revenue likewise declined in December.  The 1st Qtr FY2007 ($405,075) is -12.58% below the same period in FY2006 ($463,358).

The Revenue/Boarding ratio for the Tram continues to DECLINE!

First Quarter Revenue/Boarding

FY05     FY06     FY07

$0.19     $0.17     $0.15

The 1st Qtr FY2007 is a decline of -11.76% from FY2006 and over -21% from FY2005!

* - TVM Revenue is basically the only revenue one can measure right now, as there is no way for METRO to handle SVC's.

# February 2, 2007 8:56 PM

Royko said:

gman, I am still waiting for METRO to release the report sent to the National Transit Database (NTD) so we can compare METRO's FY2006 numbers with FY2005, and the 9 months of FY2004. ********** Unlinked Passenger Trips (UPT) FY2004 FY2005 5,349,726 10,233,638 Royko Comment- METRO is not required to keep any "Linked trips" data. ------------------------ Royko Comment– Derived METRORail Statistics: Revenue/VRM $3.14 $2.44 (-22.4%) Operating Expenses/VRM FY2004 FY2005 $29.86 $22.42 -------- ------- TAXPAYER SUBSIDY/VRM FY2004 FY2005 $26.72 $19.98 TAXPAYER SUBSIDY/UPT FY2004 FY2005 $2.36 * $1.57* *The operating expenses do not include significant costs reported to the NTD for tram post-completion rehabilitation/Reconstruction/Replacement/Improvement and tens of millions for OTHER expenses for existing service. -----------------------
# February 3, 2007 10:13 AM

ActionHouston said:

I can't speak for other HOV lanes, but in the last few weeks, I have had more experience with the 59N HOV lane that I can stand. Several times, in the last few weeks, I have had occasion to drive my wife in to work. Three times, we took the main lanes of 59N and three times, we took the HOV lane. My average time from our house in Kingwood (near the freeway) to Shell Center, on the main lanes was what it has always been - about 28.5 minutes. The average of the three times that we took the HOV lane was 36 minutes. Each time, we sat behind someone who was not going to go one mile per hour over 55mph, for the entire distance, while we watched cars pass us on the main lanes, going closer to 70mph, with a few, going even faster. The cars in the right-hand exit lanes were moving faster than we were. One time we could actually see the car that was the problem. The other two times, there were too many cars backed up by that vehicle, for us to even see the offending vehicle. As traffic slowed between 610 and I10, we usually managed to make up a little of that lost time, but only a small fraction. From now on, unless we hear that there is an accident completely blocking 59N, we will take the main lanes into town. What a total waste of freeway real estate. If that HOV lane were done away with, we could have two more lanes in each direction and that would completely alleviate any traffic problems in both directions on 59N. HOV lanes may help on some freeways, such as I10 (based upon what I have read). But, they are certainly not a cure-all for every freeway. The HOV lane on 59N is one case where an HOV was definitely a waste of taxpayer funds. There is an old saying of which freeway designers should take heed. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!" 59N has never been broke. But, adding an HOV lane got 59N a lot closer to being broke, without giving travelers any benefit. After all, a trip that takes 26% longer (36 minutes HOV vs. 28.5 minutes main lanes) certainly doesn't qualify as a benefit, unless you are looking for an excuse for being late to work. One thing is clear. The people who design our freeways seem to have a "ONE SIZE FITS ALL" mentality, regardless of the fact that traffic patterns in every town are so variable that no such animal could possibly exist. This leads me to wonder if they are really trying to solve traffic problems or just want to spend more taxpayer money, to justify their existence. Maybe in a few years, when all of our freeways are widened and they all have HOV lanes, our freeway gurus will suddenly determine that we don't need any HOV lanes and spend more money to take them all out, including the ones that are actually helping. That "ONE SIZE FITS ALL" MENTALITY certainly doesn't inspire any confidence in the people who are laying out our roads in Houston. Maybe in the next election, we can pass a referendum that will require each city planner and freeway designer in Harris County to have a plaque on his desk saying, in big bold letters, "IF IT AIN'T BROKE, DON'T FIX IT!"
# February 4, 2007 1:20 AM

Bluelight said:

So it would be better to remove the HOV lane and not have it and then as Kingwood gets bigger and traffic gets worst then come back in and add it back in.  When I lived up there I was happy to have a 30 min drive to work.  Now that I am on 290 I am lucky to have my drive to be under a hour and that is on a good day and I live 5 miles closer to town on 290.   Simple thing is if you don't need the HOV now don't use it but trust me you will be happy when those freeway drives start to hit the hour mark and you can jump on the HOV. PS I am all for impounding HOV violators cars.  2+ or 3+ people should mean two seperate bodies.  Two seperate seatbelts being used in the car.  Can you imagine if every woman that was pregnant used the HOV what traffic would be like on there.  Of if her water breaks while she is driving in the HOV.   PSS Officer I am 2 week pregnant can't you tell.  You cannot give me that ticket.....
# February 6, 2007 5:27 PM

nick said:

PLEEEESE COME TO 290 HOV I see violators everyday .talk about easy money .they come to you .

# September 13, 2007 10:14 AM

US290 HOV User said:

I am not sure if this is on purpose or not, but I barely see any police officer checking for violators on the 290HOV lane morning and afternoon. I see in a daily basis at least one or two cheaters riding the HOV 290 around 6:10am (inbound ) and 4:15pm (outbound).

If the police officer catches 3 or 4 people / peak-hour it would not be "profitable" for the city 3 or 4 times $125 / hour? Also it would deter the repeated offenders.

# September 28, 2007 1:22 PM

Sarah said:

For the last 2 months the HOV lane from Fuqua to Woodridge has been jammed pack, I can count at least 10 violaters a day, and I have not seen one officer monitoring the lane, it took me 30 minutes to get from Fuqua to Monroe, when it should just take about 10 minutes. It's just horrible.

# October 15, 2007 2:11 PM
New Comments to this post are disabled